Comparison Overview

The 1940 Air Terminal Museum

VS

Art Fund

The 1940 Air Terminal Museum

8325 Travelair, Houston, Texas, 77061, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.1940airterminal.org

The 1940 Air Terminal Museum is located in the old Houston Municipal Airport building located on the west side of William P. Hobby Airport. This building, opened in September of 1940, is a beautiful example of the art-deco architecture of the time, and served as Houston's only airport terminal until 1954. Today, it has been partially restored and houses many years of airline and civil aviation memorabilia. The 1940 Air Terminal Museum is a project of the Houston Aeronautical Heritage Society, a 501(c)(3) Texas Non-Profit Corporation.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Art Fund

2 Granary Square, London, N1C 4BH, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.artfund.org

Art Fund is the national fundraising charity for works of art and plays a major part in enriching the range, quality and understanding of art in the UK. It campaigns, fundraises and gives money to museums and galleries to buy and show art, and promotes its enjoyment through its events and membership scheme. Art Fund is funded by its art-loving and museum-going members and supporters who believe that great art should be for everyone to enjoy.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 119
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-1940-air-terminal-museum.jpeg
The 1940 Air Terminal Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/artfund.jpeg
Art Fund
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The 1940 Air Terminal Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Art Fund
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The 1940 Air Terminal Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Art Fund in 2026.

Incident History — The 1940 Air Terminal Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The 1940 Air Terminal Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Art Fund (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Art Fund cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-1940-air-terminal-museum.jpeg
The 1940 Air Terminal Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/artfund.jpeg
Art Fund
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Art Fund company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The 1940 Air Terminal Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Art Fund company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The 1940 Air Terminal Museum company.

In the current year, Art Fund company and The 1940 Air Terminal Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Art Fund company nor The 1940 Air Terminal Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Art Fund company nor The 1940 Air Terminal Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Art Fund company nor The 1940 Air Terminal Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The 1940 Air Terminal Museum company nor Art Fund company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The 1940 Air Terminal Museum nor Art Fund holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The 1940 Air Terminal Museum company nor Art Fund company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Art Fund company employs more people globally than The 1940 Air Terminal Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither The 1940 Air Terminal Museum nor Art Fund holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The 1940 Air Terminal Museum nor Art Fund holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The 1940 Air Terminal Museum nor Art Fund holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The 1940 Air Terminal Museum nor Art Fund holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The 1940 Air Terminal Museum nor Art Fund holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The 1940 Air Terminal Museum nor Art Fund holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References