Comparison Overview

Thanksgiving Point

VS

Musée du Louvre

Thanksgiving Point

3003 N Thanksgiving Way, Lehi, UT, 84043, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.thanksgivingpoint.org

Seven Experiences, Two Campuses, One Journey If you want to learn extraordinary things, go to extraordinary places. And no place is quite as extraordinary as Thanksgiving Point. This is not a once-a-year, one exhibit destination. With farms, gardens, museums and more, the opportunities for transformative learning experiences are endless. Yet, not everyone is aware of the vast offerings to be found right in their own backyard.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 398
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Musée du Louvre

Paris, Île-de-France, FR, 75001
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
https://www.louvre.fr/

Le musée du Louvre a notamment pour mission de conserver, protéger, restaurer et présenter au public les œuvres des collections inscrites sur ses inventaires comprises celles du musée national Eugène-Delacroix et des œuvres déposées dans le jardin des Tuileries ; d’assurer dans ces espaces l’accueil du public le plus large, d’en développer la fréquentation, de favoriser la connaissance des collections, de mettre en œuvre des actions d’éducation et de diffusion visant à assurer l’égal accès de tous à la culture ; d’assurer l’étude scientifique de ses collections ; de concourir à l’éducation, la formation et la recherche dans le domaine de l’histoire de l’art, de l’archéologie et de la muséographie et de gérer un auditorium. Suivez-nous également sur : https://www.facebook.com/museedulouvre/ https://twitter.com/MuseeLouvre https://www.instagram.com/museelouvre/ https://www.youtube.com/user/louvre

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 1,549
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thanksgiving-point-institute.jpeg
Thanksgiving Point
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/musee-du-louvre.jpeg
Musée du Louvre
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Thanksgiving Point
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Musée du Louvre
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Thanksgiving Point in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Musée du Louvre in 2026.

Incident History — Thanksgiving Point (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Thanksgiving Point cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Musée du Louvre (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Musée du Louvre cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thanksgiving-point-institute.jpeg
Thanksgiving Point
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/musee-du-louvre.jpeg
Musée du Louvre
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Musée du Louvre company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Thanksgiving Point company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Musée du Louvre company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Thanksgiving Point company.

In the current year, Musée du Louvre company and Thanksgiving Point company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Musée du Louvre company nor Thanksgiving Point company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Musée du Louvre company nor Thanksgiving Point company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Musée du Louvre company nor Thanksgiving Point company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Thanksgiving Point company nor Musée du Louvre company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Thanksgiving Point nor Musée du Louvre holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Thanksgiving Point company nor Musée du Louvre company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Musée du Louvre company employs more people globally than Thanksgiving Point company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Thanksgiving Point nor Musée du Louvre holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Thanksgiving Point nor Musée du Louvre holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Thanksgiving Point nor Musée du Louvre holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Thanksgiving Point nor Musée du Louvre holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Thanksgiving Point nor Musée du Louvre holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Thanksgiving Point nor Musée du Louvre holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References