Comparison Overview

Texas State Library and Archives Commission

VS

Westchester Library System

Texas State Library and Archives Commission

1201 Brazos Street, Austin, TX, 78701, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

The mission of the Texas State Library and Archives Commission is to provide Texans access to the information needed to be informed, productive citizens by preserving the archival record of Texas; enhancing the service capacity of public, academic, and school libraries; assisting public agencies in the maintenance of their records; and meeting the reading needs of Texans with disabilities.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 131
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Westchester Library System

570 Taxter Road, Elmsford, New York, 10523, US
Last Update: 2025-11-20

Westchester Library System collaborates with 38 libraries in Westchester County to provide access to resources and services and to enhance and support library service for the more than 940,000 residents. We are one of New York State’s 23 public library systems which were established in 1958 by State Education Law.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 57
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/texas-state-library-and-archives-commission.jpeg
Texas State Library and Archives Commission
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/westchester-library-system.jpeg
Westchester Library System
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Texas State Library and Archives Commission
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Westchester Library System
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Texas State Library and Archives Commission in 2025.

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Westchester Library System in 2025.

Incident History — Texas State Library and Archives Commission (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Texas State Library and Archives Commission cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Westchester Library System (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Westchester Library System cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/texas-state-library-and-archives-commission.jpeg
Texas State Library and Archives Commission
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/westchester-library-system.jpeg
Westchester Library System
Incidents

Date Detected: 04/2022
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Texas State Library and Archives Commission company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Westchester Library System company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Westchester Library System company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Texas State Library and Archives Commission company has not reported any.

In the current year, Westchester Library System company and Texas State Library and Archives Commission company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Westchester Library System company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Texas State Library and Archives Commission company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Westchester Library System company nor Texas State Library and Archives Commission company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Westchester Library System company nor Texas State Library and Archives Commission company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Texas State Library and Archives Commission company nor Westchester Library System company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Texas State Library and Archives Commission nor Westchester Library System holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Texas State Library and Archives Commission company nor Westchester Library System company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Texas State Library and Archives Commission company employs more people globally than Westchester Library System company, reflecting its scale as a Libraries.

Neither Texas State Library and Archives Commission nor Westchester Library System holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Texas State Library and Archives Commission nor Westchester Library System holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Texas State Library and Archives Commission nor Westchester Library System holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Texas State Library and Archives Commission nor Westchester Library System holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Texas State Library and Archives Commission nor Westchester Library System holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Texas State Library and Archives Commission nor Westchester Library System holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H