Comparison Overview

Texas Military Forces Museum

VS

Victoria and Albert Museum

Texas Military Forces Museum

P.O. Box 5218, Austin, Texas 78763-5218, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18

The 45,000-square foot Texas Military Forces Museum explores the history of the Lone Star State’s militia and volunteer forces from 1823 (date of the first militia muster in Stephen F. Austin’s colony) to 1903 when the Congress created the National Guard. From 1903 to the present the museum tells the story of the Texas Army and Air National Guard, as well as the Texas State Guard, in both peacetime and wartime. Permanent exhibits utilize uniforms, weapons, equipment, personal items, film, music, photographs, battle dioramas and realistic full-scale environments to tell the story of the Texas Military Forces in the Texas Revolution, the Texas Navy, the Texas Republic, the Mexican War, the Battles along the Indian Frontier, the War between the States, the Spanish-American and Philippine-American Wars, World War I, World War II, the Korean War, the Cold War, Peace Keeping Deployments and the Global War on Terror. Living history programs, battle reenactments and other special events take place throughout the year. Admission to the museum is FREE.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 47
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Victoria and Albert Museum

Cromwell Road, London, undefined, SW7 2RL, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

The V&A is the world’s leading museum of art and design with collections unrivaled in their scope and diversity. It was established to make works of art available to all and to inspire British designers and manufacturers. Today, the V&A’s collections, which span over 5000 years of human creativity in virtually every medium and from many parts of the world, continue to intrigue, inspire and inform.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 1,284
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/texas-military-forces-museum.jpeg
Texas Military Forces Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/victoria-and-albert-museum.jpeg
Victoria and Albert Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Texas Military Forces Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Victoria and Albert Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Texas Military Forces Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Victoria and Albert Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Texas Military Forces Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Texas Military Forces Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Victoria and Albert Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Victoria and Albert Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/texas-military-forces-museum.jpeg
Texas Military Forces Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/victoria-and-albert-museum.jpeg
Victoria and Albert Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Victoria and Albert Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Texas Military Forces Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Victoria and Albert Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Texas Military Forces Museum company.

In the current year, Victoria and Albert Museum company and Texas Military Forces Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Victoria and Albert Museum company nor Texas Military Forces Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Victoria and Albert Museum company nor Texas Military Forces Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Victoria and Albert Museum company nor Texas Military Forces Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Texas Military Forces Museum company nor Victoria and Albert Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Texas Military Forces Museum nor Victoria and Albert Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Victoria and Albert Museum company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Texas Military Forces Museum company.

Victoria and Albert Museum company employs more people globally than Texas Military Forces Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Texas Military Forces Museum nor Victoria and Albert Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Texas Military Forces Museum nor Victoria and Albert Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Texas Military Forces Museum nor Victoria and Albert Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Texas Military Forces Museum nor Victoria and Albert Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Texas Military Forces Museum nor Victoria and Albert Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Texas Military Forces Museum nor Victoria and Albert Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H