Comparison Overview

Texas Health Resources

VS

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Texas Health Resources

612 E Lamar Blvd, Arlington, Texas, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22

At Texas Health Resources, our mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities we serve. We are one of the largest faith-based, nonprofit health systems in the United States with a team of more than 28,000 employees of wholly owned/operated facilities and consolidated joint ventures in the greater Dallas Fort Worth area. Our career growth and professional development opportunities are top-notch and our benefits are equally outstanding. Join our award-winning Texas Health family and become a part of a team that is improving the health of our communities daily. You belong here. Let us brag for a minute on just a few of our recent accomplishments. • Fortune’s 100 Best Companies to Work For® 2025 • Business Group on Health Best Employers: Excellence in Health & Well-being Award 2025 • 20 Best Workplaces in Health Care by Great Place to Work® and Fortune 2025 • Companies That Care® by PEOPLE magazine and Great Place to Work® 2025 • America’s Best Large Employers by Forbes for 2025 • Fortune’s Best Workplaces for Women™ 2025 We are an Equal Opportunity Employer and do not discriminate against any employees or applicant for employment because of race, color, sex, age, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity, status as a veteran, and basis of disability or any other federal, state or local protected class.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 16,668
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, US, 02215
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) is part of Beth Israel Lahey Health, a new health care system that brings together academic medical centers and teaching hospitals, community and specialty hospitals, more than 4,000 physicians and 35,000 employees in a shared mission to expand access to great care and advance the science and practice of medicine through groundbreaking research and education. BIDMC is a world-class teaching hospital of Harvard Medical School and is located in the heart of Boston. We are passionate about caring for our patients like they are family, finding new cures, using the finest and the latest technologies, and teaching and inspiring caregivers of tomorrow. We put people at the center of everything we do, because we believe in medicine that puts people first. Interested in a career at BIDMC? Check out www.jobs.bidmc.org.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 11,690
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/texas-health-resources.jpeg
Texas Health Resources
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/beth-israel-deaconess-medical-center.jpeg
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Texas Health Resources
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Texas Health Resources in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in 2025.

Incident History — Texas Health Resources (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Texas Health Resources cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/texas-health-resources.jpeg
Texas Health Resources
Incidents

Date Detected: 04/2018
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Email Account Compromise
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/beth-israel-deaconess-medical-center.jpeg
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Texas Health Resources company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Texas Health Resources company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center company has not reported any.

In the current year, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center company and Texas Health Resources company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center company nor Texas Health Resources company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Texas Health Resources company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center company nor Texas Health Resources company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Texas Health Resources company nor Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Texas Health Resources nor Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Both Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center company and Texas Health Resources company have a similar number of subsidiaries worldwide.

Texas Health Resources company employs more people globally than Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Texas Health Resources nor Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Texas Health Resources nor Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Texas Health Resources nor Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Texas Health Resources nor Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Texas Health Resources nor Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Texas Health Resources nor Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H