Comparison Overview

Texas Digital Library

VS

Internet Archive

Texas Digital Library

undefined, undefined, undefined, 78711, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

The Texas Digital Library (TDL) is a multi-university consortium dedicated to providing the digital infrastructure to support a fully online scholarly community for institutions of higher education in Texas. Formed in 2005 by four Texas members of the Association of Research Libraries, the TDL has extended membership in the consortium to any of the state’s institutions of higher learning. Through the establishment of shared policies and standards, forums for professional interaction, expertise in digital collections and preservation, and robust technical services, the TDL aims to increase the availability of the enormous intellectual capital of Texas universities and to preserve it for future generations.

NAICS: 519
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Internet Archive

300 Funston Ave., San Francisco, California, US, 94188
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 0 and 549

The Internet Archive, a 501(c)(3) non-profit, is a digital library of Internet sites and other cultural artifacts in digital form. Like a paper library, we provide free access to researchers, historians, scholars, people with print disabilities, and the general public. We serve millions of people each day and are one of the top 300 web sites in the world. We are funded through donations, grants, and by providing web archiving and book digitization services for our partners. Our mission is to provide Universal Access to All Knowledge. We began in 1996 by archiving the Internet itself, a medium that was just beginning to grow in use. Today our archive contains: 735 billion web pages 41 million books and texts 14.7 million audio recordings (including 240,000 live concerts) 8.4 million videos (including 2.4 million Television News programs) 4.4 million images 890,000 software programs You can find information about our projects on our blog at https://blog.archive.org/

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 264
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/texas-digital-library.jpeg
Texas Digital Library
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/internet-archive.jpeg
Internet Archive
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Texas Digital Library
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Internet Archive
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Texas Digital Library in 2025.

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Internet Archive in 2025.

Incident History — Texas Digital Library (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Texas Digital Library cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Internet Archive (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Internet Archive cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/texas-digital-library.jpeg
Texas Digital Library
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/internet-archive.jpeg
Internet Archive
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Voice Phishing (Vishing), Credential Theft, Unrotated API Tokens, OAuth Abuse (Potential)
Motivation: Data Theft (Customer Contact Details), Potential Financial Gain (Dark Web Data Sales), Disruption (DDoS in Internet Archive Case)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Data Theft, Website Defacement, DDoS Attacks
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: malicious actors
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Texas Digital Library company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Internet Archive company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Internet Archive company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Texas Digital Library company has not reported any.

In the current year, Internet Archive company and Texas Digital Library company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Internet Archive company nor Texas Digital Library company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Internet Archive company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Texas Digital Library company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Internet Archive company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Texas Digital Library company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Texas Digital Library company nor Internet Archive company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Texas Digital Library nor Internet Archive holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Texas Digital Library company nor Internet Archive company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Internet Archive company employs more people globally than Texas Digital Library company, reflecting its scale as a Libraries.

Neither Texas Digital Library nor Internet Archive holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Texas Digital Library nor Internet Archive holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Texas Digital Library nor Internet Archive holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Texas Digital Library nor Internet Archive holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Texas Digital Library nor Internet Archive holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Texas Digital Library nor Internet Archive holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H