Comparison Overview

Texas Children's Hospital

VS

Mercy Health

Texas Children's Hospital

6621 Fannin St., Houston, 77030, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://texaschildrenspeople.org/

Texas Children’s Hospital is a world-class pediatric facility, nationally recognized as a top children’s hospital, and voted one of the best places to work in Houston for nine years running. We’re committed to creating a healthy community for children by providing the best pediatric care possible, through groundbreaking research and emphasis on education. We also offer a full continuum of family-centered care for women, from obstetrics to well-woman care. As a team member at Texas Children’s Hospital, you’ll work in an environment that values your voice. Texas Children's Hospital, headquartered in Houston, Texas, is recognized as one of America's best children's hospitals.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 12,805
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Mercy Health

Cincinnati, 45237, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799
https://www.mercy.com

At Mercy Health, we understand that every family is a universe. A network of people who love, and support, and count on one other to be there. Everybody means the world to someone and we are committed to care for others so they can be there for the ones they love. With nearly 35,000 employees across regions of Ohio and Kentucky, we’re one of the largest health care systems in the country. At each of our more than 600 points of care, we deliver high-quality, compassionate care with one united purpose: to help our patients be well in mind, body and spirit.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 14,071
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/texas-children's-hospital.jpeg
Texas Children's Hospital
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mercyhealth-chp.jpeg
Mercy Health
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Texas Children's Hospital
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mercy Health
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Texas Children's Hospital in 2026.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mercy Health in 2026.

Incident History — Texas Children's Hospital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Texas Children's Hospital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mercy Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mercy Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/texas-children's-hospital.jpeg
Texas Children's Hospital
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mercyhealth-chp.jpeg
Mercy Health
Incidents

Date Detected: 01/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Invoice Printing Error
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 08/2016
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2016
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Inadvertent Exposure (Misconfigured Internet-Accessible Files)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Texas Children's Hospital company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Mercy Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Mercy Health company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Texas Children's Hospital company has not reported any.

In the current year, Mercy Health company and Texas Children's Hospital company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mercy Health company nor Texas Children's Hospital company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Mercy Health company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Texas Children's Hospital company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Mercy Health company nor Texas Children's Hospital company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Texas Children's Hospital company nor Mercy Health company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Texas Children's Hospital nor Mercy Health holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Mercy Health company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Texas Children's Hospital company.

Mercy Health company employs more people globally than Texas Children's Hospital company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Texas Children's Hospital nor Mercy Health holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Texas Children's Hospital nor Mercy Health holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Texas Children's Hospital nor Mercy Health holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Texas Children's Hospital nor Mercy Health holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Texas Children's Hospital nor Mercy Health holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Texas Children's Hospital nor Mercy Health holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References