Comparison Overview

Texas Children's Hospital

VS

King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center

Texas Children's Hospital

6621 Fannin St., Houston, 77030, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18

Texas Children’s Hospital is a world-class pediatric facility, nationally recognized as a top children’s hospital, and voted one of the best places to work in Houston for nine years running. We’re committed to creating a healthy community for children by providing the best pediatric care possible, through groundbreaking research and emphasis on education. We also offer a full continuum of family-centered care for women, from obstetrics to well-woman care. As a team member at Texas Children’s Hospital, you’ll work in an environment that values your voice. Texas Children's Hospital, headquartered in Houston, Texas, is recognized as one of America's best children's hospitals.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 12,805
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center

At Takhassusi, Al Madhar Ash Shamali, Riyadh, Riyadh, SA, 11211
Last Update: 2026-01-16
Between 750 and 799

King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre (KFSH&RC) is a 2415 -bed tertiary/quaternary care hospital with facilities in Riyadh, Jeddah & Madinah in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. offering Established in 1970 on land donated by the late King Faisal Bin Abdulaziz, in the capital city of Riyadh and officially opened in April 1975 by King Khalid Bin Abdulaziz with a current total land area of 921,000 square meters KFSH&RC employs over 16,000 employees from over 63 different nationalities Highly specialized in inpatient and outpatient medical care, KFSH&RC participates in many clinical and research studies; it is consistently recognized and ranked as one of the nation's top hospital specializing in Oncology, Organ Transplantation, Cardiovascular Diseases Neurosciences and Genetic Diseases. King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre provides the level of specialized health care in an robust and striving educational and research environment. KFSH&RC is accredited by the Joint Commission International (JCI) and is proud to be one of only six hospitals outside of the USA to have achieved Magnet Hospital status awarded by the American Nurses Credentialing Centre (ANCC) and more recently, KFSH&RC was the first hospital outside of Northern America to be awarded Stage 7 HIMSS Electronic Medical Records, the highest level of using Electronic Health Records

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 13,922
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/texas-children's-hospital.jpeg
Texas Children's Hospital
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kfshrc.jpeg
King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Texas Children's Hospital
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Texas Children's Hospital in 2026.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center in 2026.

Incident History — Texas Children's Hospital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Texas Children's Hospital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/texas-children's-hospital.jpeg
Texas Children's Hospital
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kfshrc.jpeg
King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Texas Children's Hospital company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Texas Children's Hospital company.

In the current year, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center company and Texas Children's Hospital company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center company nor Texas Children's Hospital company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center company nor Texas Children's Hospital company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center company nor Texas Children's Hospital company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Texas Children's Hospital company nor King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Texas Children's Hospital nor King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Both King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center company and Texas Children's Hospital company have a similar number of subsidiaries worldwide.

King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center company employs more people globally than Texas Children's Hospital company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Texas Children's Hospital nor King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Texas Children's Hospital nor King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Texas Children's Hospital nor King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Texas Children's Hospital nor King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Texas Children's Hospital nor King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Texas Children's Hospital nor King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N