Comparison Overview

Texas Public Charter Schools Association

VS

NC League of Conservation Voters

Texas Public Charter Schools Association

3005 S Lamar Blvd, Austin, Texas, 78704, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.txcharterschools.org

The Texas Public Charter Schools Association (TPCSA) is committed to making sure every child in Texas has access to a high-quality public school that will set them on the path to success. Working toward this vision of the future, our mission is to support and advocate for a policy and regulatory climate that ensures every student in Texas has access to ever-improving public school options. We provide responsive membership support and resources to help schools meet a high bar for academic and financial accountability. And, we ensure that public charter schools have a voice wherever policy decisions are made—at the Texas Education Agency, the Texas Legislature, and the State Board of Education. TPCSA has been recognized as a Best Place for Working Parents and listed in Fortune magazine’s top 100 Best Workplaces in Texas. Follow us on Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram: @TPCSANews

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 37
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

NC League of Conservation Voters

127 W. Hargett Street, Suite 403, Raleigh, North Carolina, US, 27601
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749
http://www.nclcv.org

The North Carolina League of Conservation Voters (NCLCV) is a pragmatic, results-oriented, non-partisan organization whose mission is to protect the health and quality of life for all North Carolinians. We elect environmental champions, advocate for environmental policies that protect our communities, and hold elected leaders accountable for their decisions. We create a political environment that will protect our natural environment.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/texas-charter-schools-association.jpeg
Texas Public Charter Schools Association
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nclcv.jpeg
NC League of Conservation Voters
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Texas Public Charter Schools Association
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
NC League of Conservation Voters
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Texas Public Charter Schools Association in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NC League of Conservation Voters in 2025.

Incident History — Texas Public Charter Schools Association (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Texas Public Charter Schools Association cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — NC League of Conservation Voters (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NC League of Conservation Voters cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/texas-charter-schools-association.jpeg
Texas Public Charter Schools Association
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nclcv.jpeg
NC League of Conservation Voters
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Texas Public Charter Schools Association company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to NC League of Conservation Voters company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, NC League of Conservation Voters company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Texas Public Charter Schools Association company.

In the current year, NC League of Conservation Voters company and Texas Public Charter Schools Association company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither NC League of Conservation Voters company nor Texas Public Charter Schools Association company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither NC League of Conservation Voters company nor Texas Public Charter Schools Association company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither NC League of Conservation Voters company nor Texas Public Charter Schools Association company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Texas Public Charter Schools Association company nor NC League of Conservation Voters company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Texas Public Charter Schools Association nor NC League of Conservation Voters holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Texas Public Charter Schools Association company nor NC League of Conservation Voters company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Texas Public Charter Schools Association company employs more people globally than NC League of Conservation Voters company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Texas Public Charter Schools Association nor NC League of Conservation Voters holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Texas Public Charter Schools Association nor NC League of Conservation Voters holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Texas Public Charter Schools Association nor NC League of Conservation Voters holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Texas Public Charter Schools Association nor NC League of Conservation Voters holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Texas Public Charter Schools Association nor NC League of Conservation Voters holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Texas Public Charter Schools Association nor NC League of Conservation Voters holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References