Comparison Overview

Tesla

VS

Continental

Tesla

13101 Harold Green Rd, Austin, Texas, US, 78725
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.tesla.com/careers

Tesla is accelerating the world’s transition to sustainable abundance. To achieve our mission, we're building a world powered by solar, enabled by battery storage and transported by electric vehicles. We’re committed to hiring and developing top talent from around the world for any given discipline. Headquartered in Texas, we operate six huge, vertically integrated factories across three continents. With over 100,000 employees, our teams take a first-principles approach to designing, building, selling and servicing our products in-house. Our world-class teams operate with a non-conventional philosophy of inter-disciplinary collaboration. Each member of the team is expected to challenge and to be challenged, to create, and to innovate. We’re tackling the world’s most difficult and important problems—and we wouldn’t succeed without our shared passion for making the world a better place.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 72,957
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
5
View Profile

Continental

Continental-Plaza 1, Hannover, Lower Saxony, 30175, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 650 and 699
http://www.continental-careers.com

Continental develops pioneering technologies and services for sustainable and connected mobility of people and their goods. Founded in 1871, the technology company offers safe, efficient, intelligent and affordable solutions for vehicles, machines, traffic and transportation. In 2023, Continental generated sales of €41.4 billion and currently employs around 200,000 people in 56 countries and markets. - 💛 Our Netiquette 💛 - The purpose of our LinkedIn page is to offer information about products and solutions at Continental, about our company culture and about our actions and initiatives. Moreover, we would like to provide you with quick and easy contact for your questions and comments related to the above mentioned topics. We emphasize the importance of an appropriate and respectful style when communicating on our page and therefore we established the following community rules: - Please post only comments related to the topics covered by this page. - Treat each user in a respectful way, as you expect to be treated as well. Abusive language, aggression and bullying are not allowed on our page. We therefore reserve the right to remove posted comments or any other content from this site: - which is offensive or abusive, - includes a commercial benefit or unwanted advertising messages, - violates the rights of third parties as well as the right to intellectual property, - which is irrelevant or misleading - which is a spam (repeated duplicate posting) - for any other reason deemed necessary to create a helpful and respectful community The comments on our contributions reflect the opinion of individual users. Our LinkedIn page is frequently checked for possible violations as mentioned above. However, ongoing inspection of the content of the posted comments is not reasonable without concrete indication of a (legal) violation as mentioned above. We will immediately remove the relevant links if they are found to violate any aforementioned law or principle.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 78,362
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tesla-motors.jpeg
Tesla
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/continental.jpeg
Continental
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Tesla
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Continental
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

Tesla has 66.67% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Continental in 2025.

Incident History — Tesla (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tesla cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Continental (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Continental cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tesla-motors.jpeg
Tesla
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Repurposing of Vehicles
Motivation: Military Use in Conflict
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 08/2023
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/continental.jpeg
Continental
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2022
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Tesla company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Continental company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Tesla company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Continental company.

In the current year, Tesla company has reported more cyber incidents than Continental company.

Both Continental company and Tesla company have confirmed experiencing at least one ransomware attack.

Both Continental company and Tesla company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Tesla company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Continental company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Tesla company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Continental company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Tesla nor Continental holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Tesla company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Continental company.

Continental company employs more people globally than Tesla company, reflecting its scale as a Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.

Neither Tesla nor Continental holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Tesla nor Continental holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Tesla nor Continental holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Tesla nor Continental holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Tesla nor Continental holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Tesla nor Continental holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References