Comparison Overview

TES 2000 Ltd

VS

Network Rail

TES 2000 Ltd

TES House, Heath Business Park, Colchester, Essex, co2 8gu, GB
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900

Strong

TES 2000 Ltd is a long established, highly regarded contractor to the rail industry. With our Head Office based in Colchester, Essex and regional offices in Peterborough and Doncaster, we undertake a range of services on Network Rail's infrastructure. What we do Safety is our number one priority and we work collaboratively with our clients and industry safety bodies to develop and deliver innovative approaches that will enhance safety performance and strengthen the overall safety culture. We have developed high levels of expertise and provide national coverage in the delivery of Possession Management, Electrification, Technical Services, Track Renewals and Maintenance. Our People We provide our people with the very best quality training through our modern, fully equipped training centres in Colchester and Doncaster. We invest time and resource into developing our people, enabling us to provide a multi-skilled and versatile service to our clients, whilst ensuring our employees have access to excellent training and career progression opportunities. We provide a structured reward package and competitive rates of pay. Services & Expertise Our teams are experts in their fields and provide a high quality service in the delivery of Possession Management, Electrification, LXA, Technical Services, Track Renewals and Maintenance. In addition to our suite of operational services we also provide Safety Critical training through our NSAR accredited โ€˜Outstandingโ€™ Training Department.

NAICS: 482
NAICS Definition: Rail Transportation
Employees: 174
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Network Rail

The Quadrant MK, Milton Keynes, Bucks, MK9 1EN, GB
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Strong

Weโ€™re at the heart of revitalising Britainโ€™s railway, getting people and goods where they need to be and supporting the economy. Investment and modernisation are essential. So weโ€™re building the railway of the future, running a safe, reliable and efficient railway, and serving customers and communities. Our vision is Putting Passengers First โ€“ becoming a company thatโ€™s on the side of passengers and freight users. Find out more here - https://www.networkrail.co.uk/who-we-are/?utm_source=linkedin&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=social-profiles Naturally, weโ€™re constantly seeking new talent to help us achieve our ambitious goals. Views expressed by those identifying themselves as Network Rail employees do not necessarily reflect those of the organisation.

NAICS: 482
NAICS Definition: Rail Transportation
Employees: 26,549
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tes-2000-ltd.jpeg
TES 2000 Ltd
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/network-rail.jpeg
Network Rail
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
TES 2000 Ltd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Network Rail
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Rail Transportation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TES 2000 Ltd in 2025.

Incidents vs Rail Transportation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Network Rail in 2025.

Incident History โ€” TES 2000 Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TES 2000 Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Network Rail (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Network Rail cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tes-2000-ltd.jpeg
TES 2000 Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/network-rail.jpeg
Network Rail
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both TES 2000 Ltd company and Network Rail company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Network Rail company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to TES 2000 Ltd company.

In the current year, Network Rail company and TES 2000 Ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Network Rail company nor TES 2000 Ltd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Network Rail company nor TES 2000 Ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Network Rail company nor TES 2000 Ltd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither TES 2000 Ltd company nor Network Rail company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither TES 2000 Ltd company nor Network Rail company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Network Rail company employs more people globally than TES 2000 Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Rail Transportation.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Formbricks is an open source qualtrics alternative. Prior to version 4.0.1, Formbricks is missing JWT signature verification. This vulnerability stems from a token validation routine that only decodes JWTs (jwt.decode) without verifying their signatures. Both the email verification token login path and the password reset server action use the same validator, which does not check the tokenโ€™s signature, expiration, issuer, or audience. If an attacker learns the victimโ€™s actual user.id, they can craft an arbitrary JWT with an alg: "none" header and use it to authenticate and reset the victimโ€™s password. This issue has been patched in version 4.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Apollo Studio Embeddable Explorer & Embeddable Sandbox are website embeddable software solutions from Apollo GraphQL. Prior to Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3, a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified. The vulnerability arises from missing origin validation in the client-side code that handles window.postMessage events. A malicious website can send forged messages to the embedding page, causing the victimโ€™s browser to execute arbitrary GraphQL queries or mutations against their GraphQL server while authenticated with the victimโ€™s cookies. This issue has been patched in Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /consulta-dispensas. Such manipulation leads to improper authorization. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected is an unknown function of the file /module/Api/aluno. This manipulation of the argument aluno_id causes improper authorization. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Tencent WeKnora 0.1.0. This impacts the function testEmbeddingModel of the file /api/v1/initialization/embedding/test. The manipulation of the argument baseUrl results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component. The vendor responds: "We have confirmed that the issue mentioned in the report does not exist in the latest releases".

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X