Comparison Overview

Teridion

VS

Technolink

Teridion

34 Jerusalem Street, Raanana, IL
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Teridion provides an enterprise WAN service built on the public cloud. Just like you have come to expect from cloud computing, Teridion’s public cloud WAN service provides lightning-fast setup, global coverage, unbounded bandwidth and horizontal scale. The Teridion network is powered by Teridion Curated Routing, which fuses proven WAN acceleration techniques with metrics-driven route optimization. This gives enterprises: - Secure, accelerated site-to-site performance - Fast, consistent access to enterprise SaaS applications including superior low-loss, low-latency routing for voice and video - SLA backed, cost-effective replacement for MPLS - Full support for your multicloud strategy with high performance access to cloud workloads running in any cloud provider - Simple and intuitive but powerful monitoring and analytics - All this at a fraction of the price of carrier-grade and direct access circuits Teridion for Enterprise is built on Teridion’s market-proven cloud overlay network that accelerates SaaS traffic worldwide for Box, Atlassian, Salesforce, Egnyte and many others. As a true cloud service, your global WAN can be created in minutes and in service within 24 hours. Contact us at [email protected]

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 53
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Technolink

Fuzuli str 49, Baku, AZ
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 800 and 849

Technolink is the IT company in Azerbaijan Market. Official distributor of Q-matic company. Helping to Financial, Heath. Retail and Government (Public) sector to solve the problem with big Q lines. Giving CFM solution which is useful for the future business and marketing activities with customer. With the services by Technolin and Q-Matic our customers can serve their customer at the high level and more professionally.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 41
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/teridion.jpeg
Teridion
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Teridion
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Technolink
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Teridion in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Technolink in 2025.

Incident History — Teridion (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Teridion cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Technolink (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Technolink cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/teridion.jpeg
Teridion
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/technolink.jpeg
Technolink
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Technolink company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Teridion company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Technolink company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Teridion company.

In the current year, Technolink company and Teridion company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Technolink company nor Teridion company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Technolink company nor Teridion company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Technolink company nor Teridion company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Teridion company nor Technolink company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Teridion nor Technolink holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Teridion company nor Technolink company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Teridion company employs more people globally than Technolink company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither Teridion nor Technolink holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Teridion nor Technolink holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Teridion nor Technolink holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Teridion nor Technolink holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Teridion nor Technolink holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Teridion nor Technolink holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.