Comparison Overview

Tenzing Pacific Services

VS

Corporate Benefits Alliance

Tenzing Pacific Services

103 Pham Viet Chanh, Binh Thanh District, Ho Chi Minh City, undefined, undefined, VN
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ten-pac.com

We are a full service agency offering health insurance, life insurance and investment solutions to protect and grow our customers’ assets. We operate independently, focusing on Southeast Asia from our offices in Vietnam and Thailand. Our customers are expat and local, personal and corporate, straightforward and wildly complex. We work with more than 50 providers that offer an extremely wide range of financial services and insurance plans, which means our customers have meaningful choices. And we charge no additional fees for our 5-star service; see the reviews on Google and Facebook.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 52
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Corporate Benefits Alliance

23123 Ventura Blvd, Woodland Hills, California, 91364, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://www.thecorporatebenefitsalliance.com

Corporate Benefits Alliance is a market leader in the quest to make healthcare costs and medical insurance financially transparent. Companies have a right to know where their healthcare dollars go, and the answer might surprise you. CBA has recently launched a NextGen Level Funded PPO plan that utilizes one of the nation's largest and most trusted PPO networks. The plan, ProVision has embedded a proprietary adjudication model for high-dollar facility claims that saves plan sponsors 25%, on average, of their total annual healthcare spend. Unlike the systemic problems inherent in reference-based pricing plans, CBA’s ProVision plan has a single point of access for all healthcare and no chance of balance billing to the employees. Basically, it’s the same plan as you have now, just 25% less than what you currently pay.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tenzing-pacific-services.jpeg
Tenzing Pacific Services
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/corporatebenefitsauthority.jpeg
Corporate Benefits Alliance
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Tenzing Pacific Services
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Corporate Benefits Alliance
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Agencies and Brokerages Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tenzing Pacific Services in 2026.

Incidents vs Insurance Agencies and Brokerages Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Corporate Benefits Alliance in 2026.

Incident History — Tenzing Pacific Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tenzing Pacific Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Corporate Benefits Alliance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Corporate Benefits Alliance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tenzing-pacific-services.jpeg
Tenzing Pacific Services
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/corporatebenefitsauthority.jpeg
Corporate Benefits Alliance
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Corporate Benefits Alliance company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tenzing Pacific Services company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Corporate Benefits Alliance company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Tenzing Pacific Services company.

In the current year, Corporate Benefits Alliance company and Tenzing Pacific Services company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Corporate Benefits Alliance company nor Tenzing Pacific Services company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Corporate Benefits Alliance company nor Tenzing Pacific Services company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Corporate Benefits Alliance company nor Tenzing Pacific Services company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Tenzing Pacific Services company nor Corporate Benefits Alliance company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Tenzing Pacific Services nor Corporate Benefits Alliance holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Tenzing Pacific Services company nor Corporate Benefits Alliance company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Tenzing Pacific Services company employs more people globally than Corporate Benefits Alliance company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance Agencies and Brokerages.

Neither Tenzing Pacific Services nor Corporate Benefits Alliance holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Tenzing Pacific Services nor Corporate Benefits Alliance holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Tenzing Pacific Services nor Corporate Benefits Alliance holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Tenzing Pacific Services nor Corporate Benefits Alliance holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Tenzing Pacific Services nor Corporate Benefits Alliance holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Tenzing Pacific Services nor Corporate Benefits Alliance holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References