Comparison Overview

Tensilica

VS

KLA

Tensilica

2655 Seely Avenue, San Jose, CA, 95134, US
Last Update: 2025-05-05 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900

Strong

Tensilica was acquired by Cadence Design Systems, Inc., in 2013. Cadence is actively investing in the innovative Tensilica processor architecture, as well as hiring new engineers and marketing people. Please see www.cadence.com for more information

NAICS: 3344
NAICS Definition: Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

KLA

Last Update: 2024-08-11 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

KLA develops industry-leading equipment and services that enable innovation throughout the electronics industry. We provide advanced process control and process-enabling solutions for manufacturing wafers and reticles, integrated circuits, packaging and printed circuit boards. In close collaboration with leading customers across the globe, our expert teams of physicists, engineers, data scientists and problem-solvers design solutions that move the world forward. Visit us at: www.kla.com Statements made on LinkedIn may constitute forward-looking statements under federal securities laws. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that could significantly affect the expected results and are based on certain key assumptions. Due to such uncertainties and risks, no assurances can be given that such expectations will prove to have been correct, and readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date indicated. Other risks that KLA faces include those detailed in KLA filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including KLA's annual report on Form 10-K and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. Forward-looking statements made by third parties do not necessarily reflect the opinion of KLA, are outside of KLAโ€™s control and have not been verified or otherwise vetted by KLA.

NAICS: 3344
NAICS Definition: Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees: 14,333
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tensilica.jpeg
Tensilica
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/klacorp.jpeg
KLA
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Tensilica
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
KLA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tensilica in 2025.

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KLA in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Tensilica (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tensilica cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” KLA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KLA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tensilica.jpeg
Tensilica
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/klacorp.jpeg
KLA
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

KLA company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to Tensilica company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, KLA company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Tensilica company.

In the current year, KLA company and Tensilica company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither KLA company nor Tensilica company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither KLA company nor Tensilica company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither KLA company nor Tensilica company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Tensilica company nor KLA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

KLA company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Tensilica company.

KLA company employs more people globally than Tensilica company, reflecting its scale as a Semiconductor Manufacturing.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Protection Against Voltage and Clock Glitches in FPGA devices, could allow an attacker with physical access to undervolt the platform resulting in a loss of confidentiality.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Malicious code was inserted into the Nx (build system) package and several related plugins. The tampered package was published to the npm software registry, via a supply-chain attack. Affected versions contain code that scans the file system, collects credentials, and posts them to GitHub as a repo under user's accounts.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In versions from 2.1.0 to before 2.3.0, the API endpoint GET /api/problems/:id returns challenge hints in plaintext within the question object, regardless of whether the user has unlocked them via point deduction. Users can view all hints for free, undermining the business logic of the platform and reducing the integrity of the challenge system. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In version 2.1.0, the /api/admin/assign-badge endpoint lacks proper access control, allowing any authenticated user to assign high-privilege badges (e.g., Staff) to themselves. This could lead to privilege escalation and impersonation of administrative roles. This issue has been patched in version 2.2.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

parse is a package designed to parse JavaScript SDK. A Prototype Pollution vulnerability in the SingleInstanceStateController.initializeState function of parse version 5.3.0 and before allows attackers to inject properties on Object.prototype via supplying a crafted payload, causing denial of service (DoS) as the minimum consequence.