Comparison Overview

Tensile Testing Metallurgical Laboratory

VS

REM Surface Engineering

Tensile Testing Metallurgical Laboratory

4520 Willow Pkwy, Cleveland, OH 44125, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tensile.com

Tensile Testing Metallurgical Laboratory (TTML) is a full-service ISO accredited commercial testing organization located in Cleveland, OH. Services provided include mechanical, chemical, metallurgical and corrosion-resistance properties of metallic materials including in-house sample preparation. All evaluations are performed in accordance with established commercial (ASTM, AWS, etc.), Military (MIL-STD, MIL-SPEC, etc.), and/or client proprietary (Boeing, GEAE, GM, etc.) specifications and methods. TTML is accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 by A2LA and also to AC7101/Nadcap by PRI and approved by Boeing, General Electric Aircraft Engines and Messier-Dowty for aerospace testing. Clients are involved in the automotive, fastener, medical, nuclear, welding and general manufacturing markets.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

REM Surface Engineering

325 West Queen St, Southington, 06489, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799
http://www.remchem.com

REM Surface Engineering, the inventor of the ISF® Process, the Rapid ISF® Process, the Extreme ISF® Process and the REM® Process, is a global leader in providing surface engineering solutions. The REM’s isotropic superfinishing technologies are value adding and performance enhancing improvements to conventional machining operations such as grinding and lapping. Founded in 1965 in Southington, CT by Robert Michaud, REM Surface Engineering is a family owned company that has proudly been serving our partners and customers for over 50 years. REM Surface Engineering operates four locations in Brenham, TX, Southington, CT, Merrillville, IN and Willich, DE that provide products and services globally. REM Surface Engineering is the pioneer and leader in the field of engineered metal surface finishing. Universal Performance Benefits of the ISF Process: Reduce Friction Increase Part Durability Improve Corrosion Resistance Reduce Wear Reduce Lubrication Requirements and Cost Increased resistance to bending fatigue Increased tensile strength Increased part cleanliness Reduced turbulence Eliminated FOD risk Improve Oil Retention Properties Reduce Contact and Bending Fatigue Improve Pitting Resistance Reduce Vibration and Noise Reduce Applied Torque Requirements Produce a Uniform Surface Finish Produce a Superior Surface Finish

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 51
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tensile-testing-metallurgical-laboratory.jpeg
Tensile Testing Metallurgical Laboratory
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rem-surface-engineering.jpeg
REM Surface Engineering
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Tensile Testing Metallurgical Laboratory
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
REM Surface Engineering
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tensile Testing Metallurgical Laboratory in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for REM Surface Engineering in 2025.

Incident History — Tensile Testing Metallurgical Laboratory (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tensile Testing Metallurgical Laboratory cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — REM Surface Engineering (X = Date, Y = Severity)

REM Surface Engineering cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tensile-testing-metallurgical-laboratory.jpeg
Tensile Testing Metallurgical Laboratory
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rem-surface-engineering.jpeg
REM Surface Engineering
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Tensile Testing Metallurgical Laboratory company and REM Surface Engineering company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, REM Surface Engineering company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Tensile Testing Metallurgical Laboratory company.

In the current year, REM Surface Engineering company and Tensile Testing Metallurgical Laboratory company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither REM Surface Engineering company nor Tensile Testing Metallurgical Laboratory company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither REM Surface Engineering company nor Tensile Testing Metallurgical Laboratory company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither REM Surface Engineering company nor Tensile Testing Metallurgical Laboratory company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Tensile Testing Metallurgical Laboratory company nor REM Surface Engineering company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Tensile Testing Metallurgical Laboratory nor REM Surface Engineering holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Tensile Testing Metallurgical Laboratory company nor REM Surface Engineering company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

REM Surface Engineering company employs more people globally than Tensile Testing Metallurgical Laboratory company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Tensile Testing Metallurgical Laboratory nor REM Surface Engineering holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Tensile Testing Metallurgical Laboratory nor REM Surface Engineering holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Tensile Testing Metallurgical Laboratory nor REM Surface Engineering holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Tensile Testing Metallurgical Laboratory nor REM Surface Engineering holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Tensile Testing Metallurgical Laboratory nor REM Surface Engineering holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Tensile Testing Metallurgical Laboratory nor REM Surface Engineering holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References