Comparison Overview

Tennyson Center for Children

VS

Youth Eastside Services

Tennyson Center for Children

2950 Tennyson St, Denver, Colorado, US, 80212
Last Update: 2026-01-22

The Tennyson Center for Children strives to improve the mental health and wellness of those impacted by trauma and other adverse experiences. We believe that everyone has the opportunity and support needed to learn, grow, and thrive. Tennyson Center for Children has served Colorado’s most neglected, abused, and traumatized children since 1904. We provide: • An accredited, therapeutic K-12 school with a 3:1 student-to-staff ratio on our campus; • In-home and community services in 12 counties across the state to provide preventive services and therapy to strengthen families with children aged 0 to adulthood; and • Residential youth services for those who qualify for the Children’s Habilitation Residential Program (CHRP). In 2019, we began leading a collaborative statewide initiative called Rewiring, which seeks to ensure that families remain safely together and eventually reduce the number of children and families involved with the child welfare system.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 125
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Youth Eastside Services

999 164th Ave NE, Bellevue, WA, 98008, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Youth Eastside Services (YES) is the leading behavioral health service provider for children and youth, ages birth to 22, and their families in East King County. We provide evidence-based mental health counseling, substance use and co-occurring disorder counseling and treatment, early childhood behavioral health services, psychiatric services, and education and prevention programs. We help youth with: depression, grief, trauma, cultural, gender and sexual orientation identity issues, anxiety, ADHD, eating disorders, self-harming behaviors, and other challenges. We welcome children, youth and families of all backgrounds. We provide multi-lingual and culturally sensitive services. We accept most insurance plans, Medicaid, and offer a sliding fee scale. No matter what your financial situation is, you can receive help at YES. We collaborate with local school districts, government agencies, community groups, and funders to ensure that everyone in our community can access behavioral health services and programs.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 82
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tennyson-center-for-children.jpeg
Tennyson Center for Children
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/youth-eastside-services.jpeg
Youth Eastside Services
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Tennyson Center for Children
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Youth Eastside Services
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tennyson Center for Children in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Youth Eastside Services in 2026.

Incident History — Tennyson Center for Children (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tennyson Center for Children cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Youth Eastside Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Youth Eastside Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tennyson-center-for-children.jpeg
Tennyson Center for Children
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/youth-eastside-services.jpeg
Youth Eastside Services
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Tennyson Center for Children company and Youth Eastside Services company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Youth Eastside Services company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Tennyson Center for Children company.

In the current year, Youth Eastside Services company and Tennyson Center for Children company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Youth Eastside Services company nor Tennyson Center for Children company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Youth Eastside Services company nor Tennyson Center for Children company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Youth Eastside Services company nor Tennyson Center for Children company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Tennyson Center for Children company nor Youth Eastside Services company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Tennyson Center for Children nor Youth Eastside Services holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Tennyson Center for Children company nor Youth Eastside Services company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Tennyson Center for Children company employs more people globally than Youth Eastside Services company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Tennyson Center for Children nor Youth Eastside Services holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Tennyson Center for Children nor Youth Eastside Services holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Tennyson Center for Children nor Youth Eastside Services holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Tennyson Center for Children nor Youth Eastside Services holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Tennyson Center for Children nor Youth Eastside Services holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Tennyson Center for Children nor Youth Eastside Services holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N