Comparison Overview

Tennessee State Museum

VS

Minnesota Zoo

Tennessee State Museum

1000 Rosa L Parks Blvd, Nashville, Tennessee, undefined, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tnmuseum.org

The Tennessee State Museum is now open at the new location 1000 Rosa Parks Boulevard. The new Museum sits at the foot of Capitol Hill at the corner of Rosa Parks Boulevard and Jefferson Street and overlooks Bicentennial Mall State Park. The new 137,000-square-foot facility, is designed to bring history to life, and includes a “Tennessee Time Tunnel” chronicling the state’s rich history, a hands-on children’s gallery, six rotating galleries, a state-of-the art digital learning center and a two-story atrium. Exhibitions include special displays of art, furniture, textiles, and photographs produced by Tennesseans. The museum's Civil War holdings of uniforms, battle flags and weapons are among the finest in the nation. There is no admission charge for visitors. Please check our website (tnmuseum.org) or call 615-741-2692 for the most up to date information on exhibitions and events.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 67
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Minnesota Zoo

Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://mnzoo.org/

Created by the State of Minnesota, the Minnesota Zoo opened in 1978 with a mission to connect people, animals, and the natural world to save wildlife. Cutting-edge exhibits provide exciting experiences with animals and their habitats introducing guests to species from around the globe. Education programs engage audiences at the Zoo, throughout the region, and around world. Conservation programs protect endangered species and preserve critical ecosystems. Learn more about the Minnesota Zoo—our mission, leadership, and history.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 197
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tennessee-state-museum.jpeg
Tennessee State Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/minnesota-zoo.jpeg
Minnesota Zoo
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Tennessee State Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Minnesota Zoo
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tennessee State Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Minnesota Zoo in 2026.

Incident History — Tennessee State Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tennessee State Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Minnesota Zoo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Minnesota Zoo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tennessee-state-museum.jpeg
Tennessee State Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/minnesota-zoo.jpeg
Minnesota Zoo
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Minnesota Zoo company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tennessee State Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Minnesota Zoo company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Tennessee State Museum company.

In the current year, Minnesota Zoo company and Tennessee State Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Minnesota Zoo company nor Tennessee State Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Minnesota Zoo company nor Tennessee State Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Minnesota Zoo company nor Tennessee State Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Tennessee State Museum company nor Minnesota Zoo company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Tennessee State Museum nor Minnesota Zoo holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Minnesota Zoo company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Tennessee State Museum company.

Minnesota Zoo company employs more people globally than Tennessee State Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Tennessee State Museum nor Minnesota Zoo holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Tennessee State Museum nor Minnesota Zoo holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Tennessee State Museum nor Minnesota Zoo holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Tennessee State Museum nor Minnesota Zoo holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Tennessee State Museum nor Minnesota Zoo holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Tennessee State Museum nor Minnesota Zoo holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References