Comparison Overview

Tenji Concepts

VS

Mount Vernon Printing Company

Tenji Concepts

1/1 Hovey Rd, Yatala, Queensland, 4207, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tenji.com.au

We are professional manufacturers of a range of unique Exhibition and Display products. Our FleXad brand of tension fabric displays is becoming the most preferred choice for amazing looking trade show stands that set up easily and efficiently. With all our products locally printed and manufactured here in our Brisbane factory, we can provide quality products at the fastest turnaround and most affordable prices.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Mount Vernon Printing Company

13201 Mid Atlantic Blvd., Laurel, MD, 20708, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mvprint.com

Mount Vernon Printing, an RRD Company, is a service organization backed by print and mail manufacturing. We are a full-service, G7 Master Qualified union commercial printer utilizing the latest technology in pre-press, press-room, bindery, mailing and web based solutions to produce the highest quality product in the most efficient manner possible. Mount Vernon committed to leveraging our strengths, talents, resources and technologies to service our communities and our customers. We utilize our experiences to enhance the way we produce and deliver print communications. We consider our employees, clients and vendors as partners in our continued success. We value open, honest communications and strive for excellence through our professionalism, dedication, and creative thinking. In practicing these qualities, we continually seek to develop partnerships with individuals who share these ideals.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tenji-concepts.jpeg
Tenji Concepts
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mount-vernon-printing-company.jpeg
Mount Vernon Printing Company
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Tenji Concepts
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mount Vernon Printing Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tenji Concepts in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mount Vernon Printing Company in 2025.

Incident History — Tenji Concepts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tenji Concepts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mount Vernon Printing Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mount Vernon Printing Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tenji-concepts.jpeg
Tenji Concepts
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mount-vernon-printing-company.jpeg
Mount Vernon Printing Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Mount Vernon Printing Company company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tenji Concepts company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Mount Vernon Printing Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Tenji Concepts company.

In the current year, Mount Vernon Printing Company company and Tenji Concepts company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mount Vernon Printing Company company nor Tenji Concepts company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Mount Vernon Printing Company company nor Tenji Concepts company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Mount Vernon Printing Company company nor Tenji Concepts company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Tenji Concepts company nor Mount Vernon Printing Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Tenji Concepts nor Mount Vernon Printing Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Tenji Concepts company nor Mount Vernon Printing Company company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Mount Vernon Printing Company company employs more people globally than Tenji Concepts company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Tenji Concepts nor Mount Vernon Printing Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Tenji Concepts nor Mount Vernon Printing Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Tenji Concepts nor Mount Vernon Printing Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Tenji Concepts nor Mount Vernon Printing Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Tenji Concepts nor Mount Vernon Printing Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Tenji Concepts nor Mount Vernon Printing Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References