Comparison Overview

Temple University

VS

Washington University in St. Louis

Temple University

1801 N Broad St, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US, 19122
Last Update: 2026-01-19
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.temple.edu

As the largest university in one of the nation’s most iconic cities, Temple educates diverse future leaders from across Philadelphia, the country and the world who share a common drive to learn, prepare for their careers and make a real impact. Founded as a night school by Russell Conwell in 1884, Temple University has evolved into an international powerhouse in higher education. Temple is a top-tier research institution with roughly 40,000 undergraduate, graduate and professional students, 17 schools and colleges, eight campuses and hundreds of degree programs.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 13,006
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Washington University in St. Louis

One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, mo, US, 63130-4899
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799
http://washu.edu

Washington University in St. Louis, a medium-sized, independent university, is dedicated to challenging its faculty and students alike to seek new knowledge and greater understanding of an ever-changing, multicultural world. The university has played an integral role in the history and continuing growth of St. Louis and benefits in turn from the wide array of social, cultural and recreational opportunities offered by the metropolitan area to its more than 2.8 million residents. The mission of Washington University in St. Louis is the promotion of learning — learning by students and by faculty. Teaching, the transmission of knowledge, is central to our mission, as is research, the creation of new knowledge.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 17,820
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/templeuniversity.jpeg
Temple University
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/washington-university-in-st-louis.jpeg
Washington University in St. Louis
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Temple University
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Washington University in St. Louis
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Temple University in 2026.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Washington University in St. Louis in 2026.

Incident History — Temple University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Temple University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Washington University in St. Louis (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Washington University in St. Louis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/templeuniversity.jpeg
Temple University
Incidents

Date Detected: 06/2019
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Accidental Data Upload
Motivation: Accidental
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/washington-university-in-st-louis.jpeg
Washington University in St. Louis
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Washington University in St. Louis company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Temple University company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Temple University company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Washington University in St. Louis company has not reported any.

In the current year, Washington University in St. Louis company and Temple University company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Washington University in St. Louis company nor Temple University company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Washington University in St. Louis company nor Temple University company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Washington University in St. Louis company nor Temple University company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Temple University company nor Washington University in St. Louis company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Temple University nor Washington University in St. Louis holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Temple University company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Washington University in St. Louis company.

Washington University in St. Louis company employs more people globally than Temple University company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither Temple University nor Washington University in St. Louis holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Temple University nor Washington University in St. Louis holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Temple University nor Washington University in St. Louis holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Temple University nor Washington University in St. Louis holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Temple University nor Washington University in St. Louis holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Temple University nor Washington University in St. Louis holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References