Comparison Overview

Temple University

VS

Brigham Young University

Temple University

1801 N Broad St, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US, 19122
Last Update: 2026-01-19
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.temple.edu

As the largest university in one of the nation’s most iconic cities, Temple educates diverse future leaders from across Philadelphia, the country and the world who share a common drive to learn, prepare for their careers and make a real impact. Founded as a night school by Russell Conwell in 1884, Temple University has evolved into an international powerhouse in higher education. Temple is a top-tier research institution with roughly 40,000 undergraduate, graduate and professional students, 17 schools and colleges, eight campuses and hundreds of degree programs.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 13,006
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Brigham Young University

Main Campus, Provo, UT, US, 84602
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 800 and 849
https://byu.edu

We believe a world yearning for hope and joy needs the graduates of Brigham Young University—disciples of Jesus Christ who are driven by love for God and His children and who are prepared to serve and lead. This preparation demands a unique university model: at BYU, belief enhances inquiry, study amplifies faith, and revelation leads to rich understanding; at BYU, helping students develop their full divine potential is central to both our teaching and our scholarship. As the flagship higher education institution of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, BYU strives to be among the exceptional universities in the world and an essential university for the world.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 16,614
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/templeuniversity.jpeg
Temple University
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brigham-young-university.jpeg
Brigham Young University
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Temple University
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Brigham Young University
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Temple University in 2026.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brigham Young University in 2026.

Incident History — Temple University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Temple University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Brigham Young University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brigham Young University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/templeuniversity.jpeg
Temple University
Incidents

Date Detected: 06/2019
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Accidental Data Upload
Motivation: Accidental
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brigham-young-university.jpeg
Brigham Young University
Incidents

Date Detected: 03/2012
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Email
Motivation: Accidental
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Brigham Young University company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Temple University company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Temple University and Brigham Young University have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Brigham Young University company and Temple University company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Brigham Young University company nor Temple University company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Brigham Young University company nor Temple University company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Brigham Young University company nor Temple University company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Temple University company nor Brigham Young University company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Temple University nor Brigham Young University holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Temple University company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Brigham Young University company.

Brigham Young University company employs more people globally than Temple University company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither Temple University nor Brigham Young University holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Temple University nor Brigham Young University holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Temple University nor Brigham Young University holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Temple University nor Brigham Young University holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Temple University nor Brigham Young University holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Temple University nor Brigham Young University holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References