Comparison Overview

Temple Allen Industries

VS

DJH Group Ltd

Temple Allen Industries

687-J Lofstrand Lane, Rockville, MD, 20850, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Temple Allen Industries (TAI) designs and manufactures Smart Automation™ and 100% pneumatic EMMA™ (Easily Manipulated Mechanical Arm) and SAM (Standup Abrading Machine) for a variety of surface preparation tasks (sanding, grinding, polishing, cleaning). We routinely collaborate with clients to solve challenges related to ergonomics, health & safety, and productivity. Our EMMA and SAM technologies wield sanding tools that are commonly utilized in industry - but we make it so that the artisan does not have to hold onto the sander, eliminating vibration exposure, high grip forces, poor operational postures, and fatigue. We also dramatically reduce exposure to toxic dust. Customers have typically found that our systems pay for themselves in less than nine months, and require minimal training and maintenance. Furthermore, eliminating repetitive-motion and vibration-induced injuries, we increase employee morale while decreasing workers compensation costs.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

DJH Group Ltd

Project House, Consett, Co.Durham, DH8 6BP, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Established for over 30 years DJH Group Ltd have built a reputation for excellence in design and manufacturing in pewter and tin alloys. We combine a unique blend of traditional craftsmen skills with modern foundry technology to achieve optimum results. From our purpose built factory in Durham, UK we supply business to business customers worldwide.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/temple-allen-industries.jpeg
Temple Allen Industries
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/djhgroupltd.jpeg
DJH Group Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Temple Allen Industries
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
DJH Group Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Temple Allen Industries in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DJH Group Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — Temple Allen Industries (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Temple Allen Industries cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — DJH Group Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DJH Group Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/temple-allen-industries.jpeg
Temple Allen Industries
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/djhgroupltd.jpeg
DJH Group Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Temple Allen Industries company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to DJH Group Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, DJH Group Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Temple Allen Industries company.

In the current year, DJH Group Ltd company and Temple Allen Industries company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither DJH Group Ltd company nor Temple Allen Industries company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither DJH Group Ltd company nor Temple Allen Industries company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither DJH Group Ltd company nor Temple Allen Industries company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Temple Allen Industries company nor DJH Group Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Temple Allen Industries nor DJH Group Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Temple Allen Industries company nor DJH Group Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Temple Allen Industries company employs more people globally than DJH Group Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Temple Allen Industries nor DJH Group Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Temple Allen Industries nor DJH Group Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Temple Allen Industries nor DJH Group Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Temple Allen Industries nor DJH Group Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Temple Allen Industries nor DJH Group Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Temple Allen Industries nor DJH Group Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H