Comparison Overview

TeleMessage, a Smarsh Company

VS

Bell

TeleMessage, a Smarsh Company

468 Great Road, Acton, MA, 01720, US
Last Update: 2026-01-20
Between 700 and 749

TeleMessage, a Smarsh Company, is Transforming Business Mobile Messaging and Archiving: Managed, Secure, Reliable and IT Ready. The TeleMessage Mobile Archiver effectively addresses compliance, regulatory and eDiscovery response requirements. It reduces risk across a variety of industries, capturing mobile content from any combination of device or carrier and supporting phone ownership either by company or BYOD. We’ve also developed an innovative, all-encompassing messaging suite for enterprises that replicates the ease of use of consumer applications, while providing all the additional tools that businesses need in order to stay on top of corporate mobile messaging. Our offering includes an integrated Android/iOS mobile apps, web portal, Outlook Plug-in, and a range of APIs that connect to any operational IT system. We support archiving both On-prem and in the cloud, working with a wide variety of carriers. TeleMessage has been providing state-of-the-art messaging solutions for over 15 years. Our software has been successfully deployed and used by thousands of enterprises, trusted by dozens of telecom operators, reaches hundreds of millions of users and powers billions of messages through customers’ networks. We support an ever growing number of enterprises, including leading brands across a range of industries such as healthcare, travel, finance and retail, among others.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 99
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Bell

1 carrefour Alexandre-Graham-Bell, Montreal, Quebec, CA, H3E 3B3
Last Update: 2026-01-19
Between 750 and 799

We advance how people connect with each other and the world #ConnectionIsEverything. Bell is Canada's largest communications company providing advanced Bell broadband wireless, Internet, TV, media and business communications services. Founded in Montréal in 1880, Bell is wholly owned by BCE Inc. To learn more, please visit Bell.ca or BCE.ca Through Bell for Better, we are investing to create a better today and a better tomorrow by supporting the social and economic prosperity of our communities. This includes the Bell Let's Talk initiative, which promotes Canadian mental health with national awareness and anti-stigma campaigns like Bell Let's Talk Day and significant Bell funding of community care and access, research and workplace initiatives throughout the country. To learn more, please visit Bell.ca/LetsTalk

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 33,894
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/telemessage.jpeg
TeleMessage, a Smarsh Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bell.jpeg
Bell
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
TeleMessage, a Smarsh Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bell
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TeleMessage, a Smarsh Company in 2026.

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bell in 2026.

Incident History — TeleMessage, a Smarsh Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TeleMessage, a Smarsh Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bell (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bell cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/telemessage.jpeg
TeleMessage, a Smarsh Company
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Exposed Endpoint, Outdated Technology, Lack of End-to-End Encryption, Poor Misconfiguration
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Exposed diagnostic endpoint
Motivation: Data Theft
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bell.jpeg
Bell
Incidents

Date Detected: 01/2018
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 05/2017
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Bell company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to TeleMessage, a Smarsh Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

TeleMessage, a Smarsh Company and Bell have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Bell company and TeleMessage, a Smarsh Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bell company nor TeleMessage, a Smarsh Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Bell company has disclosed at least one data breach, while TeleMessage, a Smarsh Company company has not reported such incidents publicly.

TeleMessage, a Smarsh Company company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Bell company has not reported such incidents publicly.

TeleMessage, a Smarsh Company company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Bell company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither TeleMessage, a Smarsh Company nor Bell holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither TeleMessage, a Smarsh Company company nor Bell company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Bell company employs more people globally than TeleMessage, a Smarsh Company company, reflecting its scale as a Telecommunications.

Neither TeleMessage, a Smarsh Company nor Bell holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither TeleMessage, a Smarsh Company nor Bell holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither TeleMessage, a Smarsh Company nor Bell holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither TeleMessage, a Smarsh Company nor Bell holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither TeleMessage, a Smarsh Company nor Bell holds HIPAA certification.

Neither TeleMessage, a Smarsh Company nor Bell holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

SummaryA command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) has been found to exist in the `wrangler pages deploy` command. The issue occurs because the `--commit-hash` parameter is passed directly to a shell command without proper validation or sanitization, allowing an attacker with control of `--commit-hash` to execute arbitrary commands on the system running Wrangler. Root causeThe commitHash variable, derived from user input via the --commit-hash CLI argument, is interpolated directly into a shell command using template literals (e.g.,  execSync(`git show -s --format=%B ${commitHash}`)). Shell metacharacters are interpreted by the shell, enabling command execution. ImpactThis vulnerability is generally hard to exploit, as it requires --commit-hash to be attacker controlled. The vulnerability primarily affects CI/CD environments where `wrangler pages deploy` is used in automated pipelines and the --commit-hash parameter is populated from external, potentially untrusted sources. An attacker could exploit this to: * Run any shell command. * Exfiltrate environment variables. * Compromise the CI runner to install backdoors or modify build artifacts. Credits Disclosed responsibly by kny4hacker. Mitigation * Wrangler v4 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v4.59.1 or higher. * Wrangler v3 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v3.114.17 or higher. * Users on Wrangler v2 (EOL) should upgrade to a supported major version.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H