Comparison Overview

Telegram Messenger

VS

The Death Star

Telegram Messenger

Business Central Towers, Tower A, Dubai, undefined, 501919, AE
Last Update: 2025-12-19
Between 750 and 799

Pure instant messaging — simple, fast, secure, and synced across all your devices.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2,158
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

The Death Star

Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

The mission of the Death Star is to keep the local systems "in line". As we have recently dissolved our Board of Directors, there is little resistance to our larger goal of universal domination. Our Stormtroopers are excellent shots and operate with our Navy, and are fielded like marines - separate from our army.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/telegram-messenger.jpeg
Telegram Messenger
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-death-star.jpeg
The Death Star
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Telegram Messenger
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Death Star
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Telegram Messenger in 2025.

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Death Star in 2025.

Incident History — Telegram Messenger (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Telegram Messenger cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Death Star (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Death Star cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/telegram-messenger.jpeg
Telegram Messenger
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Disguised .htm files leading to unauthorized JavaScript execution
Motivation: Data Exfiltration, Phishing, Banking Trojans
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-death-star.jpeg
The Death Star
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Death Star company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Telegram Messenger company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Telegram Messenger company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas The Death Star company has not reported any.

In the current year, The Death Star company and Telegram Messenger company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Death Star company nor Telegram Messenger company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Death Star company nor Telegram Messenger company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Death Star company nor Telegram Messenger company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Telegram Messenger company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while The Death Star company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Telegram Messenger nor The Death Star holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Telegram Messenger company nor The Death Star company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Death Star company employs more people globally than Telegram Messenger company, reflecting its scale as a Technology, Information and Internet.

Neither Telegram Messenger nor The Death Star holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Telegram Messenger nor The Death Star holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Telegram Messenger nor The Death Star holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Telegram Messenger nor The Death Star holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Telegram Messenger nor The Death Star holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Telegram Messenger nor The Death Star holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability has been found in SeaCMS up to 13.3. The affected element is an unknown function of the file js/player/dmplayer/dmku/class/mysqli.class.php. Such manipulation of the argument page/limit leads to sql injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in HappyDevs TempTool allows Stored XSS.This issue affects TempTool: from n/a through 1.3.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Tormorten WP Microdata allows Stored XSS.This issue affects WP Microdata: from n/a through 1.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

Exposure of Sensitive System Information to an Unauthorized Control Sphere vulnerability in HappyDevs TempTool allows Retrieve Embedded Sensitive Data.This issue affects TempTool: from n/a through 1.3.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

A vulnerability has been found in Tenda FH1201 1.2.0.14(408). Affected is the function sprintf of the file /goform/SetIpBind. Such manipulation of the argument page leads to stack-based buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 9.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X