Comparison Overview

Teledyne TapTone

VS

Fallas Automation

Teledyne TapTone

49 Edgerton Drive, North Falmouth, MA, 02556, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

In 1971, a new method for the inspection of container integrity was patented and the TapTone product line was created from technology originally developed at Benthos. The product line was initially used to detect defective containers inside sealed cardboard boxes. Just two years later the first automatic high speed TapTone system was installed on a popular baby food production line and the package inspection company was off and running. Today, Teledyne TapTone's products are used in the food, health and beauty, chemical, beverage, and household chemical markets to check for container integrity. TapTone inspection systems are the gold standard in glass beer bottle inspection and TapTone's customer base includes all the major product brands found in your refrigerator and cabinets today. The company's technologies have also grown and now include four major groupings including acoustic, proximity, pressure inspection, and most recently vision inspection. TapTone's products are protected by numerous patents and are sold by a network of agents and distributors around the globe.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Fallas Automation

7000 Imperial Dr, Waco, TX 76712, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Fallas Automation is a case packaging equipment builder with the goal to make and deliver, on schedule, the best case packing machinery in terms of quality and value as perceived by our customers. We provide full systems from infeed conveyors to case sealers. That way you know you are getting a system that works. For over 40 years we've listened to your requirements for simple compact, lower-cost case packers and equipment. Here is the result: The kind of machines you'd build yourself if you had the time and resources

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 63
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/teledyne-taptone.jpeg
Teledyne TapTone
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fallas-automation.jpeg
Fallas Automation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Teledyne TapTone
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fallas Automation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Teledyne TapTone in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fallas Automation in 2025.

Incident History — Teledyne TapTone (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Teledyne TapTone cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fallas Automation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fallas Automation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/teledyne-taptone.jpeg
Teledyne TapTone
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fallas-automation.jpeg
Fallas Automation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Teledyne TapTone company and Fallas Automation company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Fallas Automation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Teledyne TapTone company.

In the current year, Fallas Automation company and Teledyne TapTone company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fallas Automation company nor Teledyne TapTone company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fallas Automation company nor Teledyne TapTone company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fallas Automation company nor Teledyne TapTone company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Teledyne TapTone company nor Fallas Automation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Teledyne TapTone nor Fallas Automation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Teledyne TapTone company nor Fallas Automation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Fallas Automation company employs more people globally than Teledyne TapTone company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Teledyne TapTone nor Fallas Automation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Teledyne TapTone nor Fallas Automation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Teledyne TapTone nor Fallas Automation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Teledyne TapTone nor Fallas Automation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Teledyne TapTone nor Fallas Automation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Teledyne TapTone nor Fallas Automation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H