Comparison Overview

Telcel

VS

VEON

Telcel

Lago Zurich, Granada, Distrito Federal, 11520, MX
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.telcel.com

Telcel (Radiomóvil Dipsa) es subsidiaria de América Móvil, uno de los mayores proveedores de comunicaciones celulares de Latinoamérica, grupo líder con inversiones en telecomunicaciones en varios países del continente americano. Telcel es la empresa de telefonía celular líder en México. Nuestra solidez y estructura nos consolidan gracias a la especialización y actualización permanente de todas las personas que trabajamos en ella. Todos nosotros estamos comprometidos a satisfacer de manera eficaz y constante todas las necesidades de comunicación inalámbrica de nuestros clientes.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 15,551
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

VEON

Index Tower, Trade Centre, Dubai International Financial Centre , Dubai, United Arab Emirates, AE
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
https://www.veon.com/

VEON is a global digital operator headquartered in Dubai, providing connectivity and digital services across dynamic frontier markets that are home to more than 6% of the world’s population. With our digital operators, we transform lives through technology-driven services that empower millions and drive economic growth. Social media guidelines: We want everybody to have a positive and welcoming experience across the social media channels we use - and so we ask that everyone keeps their comments and discussions on VEON's page, or posts tagging the company, respectful to other members and our teams. Content which is abusive or harassing, obscene, deceptive or misleading, contains false or defamatory information, is discriminatory against any individual or group, or is considered spam may be removed - including reporting and blocking users responsible from our social media channels.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 12,981
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/telcel.jpeg
Telcel
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/veon.jpeg
VEON
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Telcel
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
VEON
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Telcel in 2025.

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VEON in 2025.

Incident History — Telcel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Telcel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — VEON (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VEON cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/telcel.jpeg
Telcel
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/veon.jpeg
VEON
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Telcel company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to VEON company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

VEON company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Telcel company has not reported any.

In the current year, VEON company and Telcel company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither VEON company nor Telcel company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither VEON company nor Telcel company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

VEON company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Telcel company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Telcel company nor VEON company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Telcel nor VEON holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

VEON company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Telcel company.

Telcel company employs more people globally than VEON company, reflecting its scale as a Telecommunications.

Neither Telcel nor VEON holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Telcel nor VEON holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Telcel nor VEON holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Telcel nor VEON holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Telcel nor VEON holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Telcel nor VEON holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References