Comparison Overview

Telcel

VS

T-Mobile

Telcel

Lago Zurich, Granada, Distrito Federal, 11520, MX
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.telcel.com

Telcel (Radiomóvil Dipsa) es subsidiaria de América Móvil, uno de los mayores proveedores de comunicaciones celulares de Latinoamérica, grupo líder con inversiones en telecomunicaciones en varios países del continente americano. Telcel es la empresa de telefonía celular líder en México. Nuestra solidez y estructura nos consolidan gracias a la especialización y actualización permanente de todas las personas que trabajamos en ella. Todos nosotros estamos comprometidos a satisfacer de manera eficaz y constante todas las necesidades de comunicación inalámbrica de nuestros clientes.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 15,551
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

T-Mobile

12920 SE 38th St, Bellevue, WA, US, 98006
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 600 and 649
https://bit.ly/3IK6i13

T-Mobile US, Inc. (NASDAQ: TMUS) is America’s supercharged Un-carrier, delivering an advanced 4G LTE and transformative nationwide 5G network that will offer reliable connectivity for all. T-Mobile’s customers benefit from its unmatched combination of value and quality, unwavering obsession with offering them the best possible service experience and undisputable drive for disruption that creates competition and innovation in wireless and beyond. Based in Bellevue, Wash., T-Mobile provides services through its subsidiaries and operates its flagship brands, T-Mobile and Metro by T-Mobile. For more information, please visit: https://www.t-mobile.com.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 89,361
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
15
Attack type number
4

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/telcel.jpeg
Telcel
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/t-mobile.jpeg
T-Mobile
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Telcel
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
T-Mobile
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Telcel in 2025.

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

T-Mobile has 31.58% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Telcel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Telcel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — T-Mobile (X = Date, Y = Severity)

T-Mobile cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/telcel.jpeg
Telcel
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/t-mobile.jpeg
T-Mobile
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Passive Eavesdropping, Unencrypted Satellite Transmissions, Lack of Signal Encryption
Motivation: Academic Research, Security Awareness, Vulnerability Disclosure
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Routing Infrastructure
Motivation: Surveillance, Espionage
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2023
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Telcel company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to T-Mobile company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

T-Mobile company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Telcel company has not reported any.

In the current year, T-Mobile company has reported more cyber incidents than Telcel company.

Neither T-Mobile company nor Telcel company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

T-Mobile company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Telcel company has not reported such incidents publicly.

T-Mobile company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Telcel company has not reported such incidents publicly.

T-Mobile company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Telcel company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Telcel nor T-Mobile holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

T-Mobile company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Telcel company.

T-Mobile company employs more people globally than Telcel company, reflecting its scale as a Telecommunications.

Neither Telcel nor T-Mobile holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Telcel nor T-Mobile holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Telcel nor T-Mobile holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Telcel nor T-Mobile holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Telcel nor T-Mobile holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Telcel nor T-Mobile holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References