Comparison Overview

Telcel

VS

EchoStar Corporation

Telcel

Lago Zurich, Granada, Distrito Federal, 11520, MX
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Telcel (Radiomóvil Dipsa) es subsidiaria de América Móvil, uno de los mayores proveedores de comunicaciones celulares de Latinoamérica, grupo líder con inversiones en telecomunicaciones en varios países del continente americano. Telcel es la empresa de telefonía celular líder en México. Nuestra solidez y estructura nos consolidan gracias a la especialización y actualización permanente de todas las personas que trabajamos en ella. Todos nosotros estamos comprometidos a satisfacer de manera eficaz y constante todas las necesidades de comunicación inalámbrica de nuestros clientes.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 15,551
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

EchoStar Corporation

9601 S Meridian Blvd, Englewood, 80112, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

EchoStar Corporation (Nasdaq: SATS) is a premier provider of technology, networking services, television entertainment and connectivity, offering consumer, enterprise, operator and government solutions worldwide under its EchoStar®, Boost Mobile®, Sling TV, DISH TV, Hughes®, HughesNet®, HughesON™ and JUPITER™ brands. Tune into the innovation, collaboration and culture that our team members bring to the office every day. We want you to be a part of our journey to build the next generation of technology that transforms the way the world communicates. Our team members are the key to our history of groundbreaking innovation and our continued progress. If you bring an inquisitive curiosity, a sense of pride in your work, an openness to adventure and a drive to win, we’ll provide the structure to take the next step in your career. This is more than just another job, this is your launchpad to achieve your potential and a community dedicated to your growth.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 28,347
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/telcel.jpeg
Telcel
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/echostar-corporation.jpeg
EchoStar Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Telcel
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
EchoStar Corporation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Telcel in 2025.

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EchoStar Corporation in 2025.

Incident History — Telcel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Telcel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — EchoStar Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EchoStar Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/telcel.jpeg
Telcel
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/echostar-corporation.jpeg
EchoStar Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

EchoStar Corporation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Telcel company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, EchoStar Corporation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Telcel company.

In the current year, EchoStar Corporation company and Telcel company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither EchoStar Corporation company nor Telcel company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither EchoStar Corporation company nor Telcel company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither EchoStar Corporation company nor Telcel company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Telcel company nor EchoStar Corporation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Telcel nor EchoStar Corporation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

EchoStar Corporation company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Telcel company.

EchoStar Corporation company employs more people globally than Telcel company, reflecting its scale as a Telecommunications.

Neither Telcel nor EchoStar Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Telcel nor EchoStar Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Telcel nor EchoStar Corporation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Telcel nor EchoStar Corporation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Telcel nor EchoStar Corporation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Telcel nor EchoStar Corporation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N