Comparison Overview

Telavita

VS

The Stone Foundation

Telavita

SP-010, São Paulo, BR
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Soluções completas e integradas em Saúde Mental para você e para sua empresa. Os programas da Telavita são personalizados e desenhados para ajudar sua empresa a identificar, compreender e implementar estratégias de saúde mensuráveis e eficazes. Tecnologia de ponta, corpo clínico qualificado e um time de especialistas em gestão de saúde populacional para entregar o cuidado que você precisa, da forma que você quer. Cuidar da saúde mental dos colaboradores também é cuidar da saúde financeira das empresas. Conheça a Telavita e garanta mais saúde emocional em sua equipe. Telavita - Cuidado especializado em saúde emocional. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Complete and integrated Mental Health solutions for you and your company. Telavita's programs are customized and designed to help your company identify, understand and implement measurable and effective health strategies. High technology, qualified clinical staff and a team of experts in population health management to deliver the care you need, the way you want it. Taking care of employees' mental health is also taking care of the financial health of companies. Get to know Telavita and ensure more emotional health in your team.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 241
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Stone Foundation

320 E. Towsontown Blvd, Towson, Maryland, 21286, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

The Stone Foundation, Towson's premier source for behavioral health has been proudly serving people, practitioners and the profession since 2005. Our community of diverse counselors and committed administrative professionals have created an environment where clients can receive specialized counseling services. We believe that the client/counselor relationship is central to the healing process and have developed a unique Ideal Client Discovery that helps match clients with clinicians that are especially qualified to support them in their journey towards better mental health. Beyond the counseling session, TSF is an MBE Certified behavioral health firm that partners with local, state and federal governments to achieve behavioral health outcomes. Our work with Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore City Parks and Recreation, Baltimore County Public Schools, the Mayor's Office of Unemployment Development, the Robert Woods Johnson Foundation, Maryland State Department of Education, Morgan State University, University of Maryland and many others has allowed us to positively impact thousands of lives. Visit www.thestonefoundation.com today to find an archive of hundreds of blog articles sharing tools, tips, insights and perspective on how to live a healthy and balanced life.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/telavita.jpeg
Telavita
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-stone-foundation.jpeg
The Stone Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Telavita
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Stone Foundation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Telavita in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Stone Foundation in 2026.

Incident History — Telavita (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Telavita cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Stone Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Stone Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/telavita.jpeg
Telavita
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-stone-foundation.jpeg
The Stone Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Telavita company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Stone Foundation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Stone Foundation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Telavita company.

In the current year, The Stone Foundation company and Telavita company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Stone Foundation company nor Telavita company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Stone Foundation company nor Telavita company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Stone Foundation company nor Telavita company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Telavita company nor The Stone Foundation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Telavita nor The Stone Foundation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Telavita company nor The Stone Foundation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Telavita company employs more people globally than The Stone Foundation company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Telavita nor The Stone Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Telavita nor The Stone Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Telavita nor The Stone Foundation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Telavita nor The Stone Foundation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Telavita nor The Stone Foundation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Telavita nor The Stone Foundation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N