Comparison Overview

Tekfen Construction

VS

STRABAG

Tekfen Construction

Kültür Mahallesi, Tekfen Sitesi Budak Sokak, A Blok, No:7 Ulus - Beşiktaş 34340 İstanbul, Türkiye, Beşiktaş, Ulus - Beşiktaş 34340, TR Istanbul, 34340, TR
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Tekfen Contracting Group is one of the two most prominent groups of Tekfen Holding, with its more than 17 thousand employees, nearly 2 billion USD of active portfolio and over 330 projects undertaken successfully to date. The Group is considered as one of the biggest institutions in Turkey, in terms of value of its completed projects, and owns one of the largest construction machinery and equipment inventories in the country. Tekfen Contracting Group, whose origin goes back to 1956, is considered as one of the leading contractors of its region today, and is active in all aspects of contracting business including feasibility, engineering, construction, assembly, maintenance, project control, management and counseling.

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

STRABAG

Ortenburger Strasse 27, Spittal/Drau, Kärnten, AT, 9800
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

At STRABAG around 86,000 people working on progress at more than 2,400 locations worldwide. Uniqueness and individual strengths characterise both our projects and each of us as individuals. Whether its building construction, civil engineering, road construction, underground engineering, bridge building, tunnelling, construction material production, project development or building management – we are always one step ahead so that we can become the most innovative and sustainable construction technology company in Europe. Diversity, inclusion and equal opportunities are integral to this, who we are as a company and how we work. Together we work as partners to complete projects successfully and grow with new challenges. Together we achieve great things. Let’s progress!

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 15,074
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tekfen-construction.jpeg
Tekfen Construction
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/strabag.jpeg
STRABAG
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Tekfen Construction
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
STRABAG
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tekfen Construction in 2025.

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for STRABAG in 2025.

Incident History — Tekfen Construction (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tekfen Construction cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — STRABAG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

STRABAG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tekfen-construction.jpeg
Tekfen Construction
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/strabag.jpeg
STRABAG
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

STRABAG company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tekfen Construction company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, STRABAG company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Tekfen Construction company.

In the current year, STRABAG company and Tekfen Construction company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither STRABAG company nor Tekfen Construction company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither STRABAG company nor Tekfen Construction company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither STRABAG company nor Tekfen Construction company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Tekfen Construction company nor STRABAG company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Tekfen Construction nor STRABAG holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Tekfen Construction company nor STRABAG company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

STRABAG company employs more people globally than Tekfen Construction company, reflecting its scale as a Construction.

Neither Tekfen Construction nor STRABAG holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Tekfen Construction nor STRABAG holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Tekfen Construction nor STRABAG holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Tekfen Construction nor STRABAG holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Tekfen Construction nor STRABAG holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Tekfen Construction nor STRABAG holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H