Comparison Overview

Tek Ninja Design

VS

Vivix Design

Tek Ninja Design

12100 ne 16 ave, miami, Florida, 33161, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01

At Tek Ninja Design we make sure to give you a creative and professional outlook that will keep you on top of the cutting edge of your industry. Here at Tek Ninja Design we have been working on a variant of many interesting projects. From the Miami Florida area we have clients that are private defensive contractors; we have clients from the North Miami Beach area with law firms and accounting services. We also have been servicing new clients in the Atlanta Georgia, California, and New York regions. We are introducing new content, new services, and products from Tek Ninja Design.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Vivix Design

Haarsterweg 7 Marum, Groningen 9363 VB, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

- Branding - Graphic Design - Advertising - Logo - Brochure - Annual Reports Bij Vivix Design kunt u terecht voor huisstijlontwikkeling van begin tot eind. Dus van conceptontwikkeling van het logo tot het begeleidend drukken en bewaken van uw huisstijl. Naast de huisstijl verzorgt Vivix Design ook brochures, jaarverslagen, periodieken, enzovoort. Al uw reclameuitingen via één aanspreekpunt.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tek-ninja-design.jpeg
Tek Ninja Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vivix-design.jpeg
Vivix Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Tek Ninja Design
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Vivix Design
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tek Ninja Design in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Vivix Design in 2025.

Incident History — Tek Ninja Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tek Ninja Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Vivix Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Vivix Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tek-ninja-design.jpeg
Tek Ninja Design
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vivix-design.jpeg
Vivix Design
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Tek Ninja Design company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Vivix Design company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Vivix Design company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Tek Ninja Design company.

In the current year, Vivix Design company and Tek Ninja Design company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Vivix Design company nor Tek Ninja Design company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Vivix Design company nor Tek Ninja Design company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Vivix Design company nor Tek Ninja Design company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Tek Ninja Design company nor Vivix Design company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Tek Ninja Design nor Vivix Design holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Tek Ninja Design company nor Vivix Design company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Tek Ninja Design company employs more people globally than Vivix Design company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Tek Ninja Design nor Vivix Design holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Tek Ninja Design nor Vivix Design holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Tek Ninja Design nor Vivix Design holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Tek Ninja Design nor Vivix Design holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Tek Ninja Design nor Vivix Design holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Tek Ninja Design nor Vivix Design holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X