Comparison Overview

Tecnopuc

VS

American Growth Project

Tecnopuc

Avenida Ipiranga 6681, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90619-900, BR
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

For over 20 years, we've been working on being stabilished as a global innovation ecosystem, where talents from everywhere come together to drive businesses, projects, and products capable of make an impacting in the world. Through science and technology, we seek innovative solutions to global challenges, co-creating with a community that shares knowledge, resources, and results. All supported by a cutting-edge structure offered by PUCRS, a world-class university. We are more than 290 organizations and startups, connected to over 150 institutions around the world. Come connect to this network and discover that innovation is possible when collaborating with one of the best global innovation ecosystems, as recognized by the Triple E Awards 2023.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 67
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

American Growth Project

None, None, Chapel Hill, NC, US, None
Last Update: 2025-12-01

The United States is home not to one, but more than 100 distinct economies. Our cities, towns, suburbs and rural communities hold the key to understanding both current and forecasted national trends – but for far too long, our nation’s microeconomic data has been lacking. The American Growth Project is here to help.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tecnopuc.jpeg
Tecnopuc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/american-growth-project.jpeg
American Growth Project
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Tecnopuc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
American Growth Project
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tecnopuc in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for American Growth Project in 2025.

Incident History — Tecnopuc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tecnopuc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — American Growth Project (X = Date, Y = Severity)

American Growth Project cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tecnopuc.jpeg
Tecnopuc
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/american-growth-project.jpeg
American Growth Project
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

American Growth Project company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tecnopuc company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, American Growth Project company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Tecnopuc company.

In the current year, American Growth Project company and Tecnopuc company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither American Growth Project company nor Tecnopuc company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither American Growth Project company nor Tecnopuc company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither American Growth Project company nor Tecnopuc company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Tecnopuc company nor American Growth Project company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Tecnopuc nor American Growth Project holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Tecnopuc company nor American Growth Project company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Tecnopuc nor American Growth Project holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Tecnopuc nor American Growth Project holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Tecnopuc nor American Growth Project holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Tecnopuc nor American Growth Project holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Tecnopuc nor American Growth Project holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Tecnopuc nor American Growth Project holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X