Comparison Overview

Techsecure

VS

Nokia

Techsecure

None
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

None

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Nokia

Karakaari 7, Espoo, Southern Finland, 02610, FI
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

At Nokia, we create technology that helps the world act together. As a B2B technology innovation leader, we are pioneering the future where networks meet cloud to realize the full potential of digital in every industry. Through networks that sense, think and act, we work with our customers and partners to create the digital services and applications of the future. For our latest updates, please visit us online www.nokia.com To view open positions and to apply, please visit: www.nokia.com/careers

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 91,765
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Techsecure
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nokia.jpeg
Nokia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Techsecure
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Nokia
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Techsecure in 2025.

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

Nokia has 69.49% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Techsecure (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Techsecure cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Nokia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nokia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Techsecure
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Exploited vulnerability in cloud storage service
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2023
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Software Vulnerability
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nokia.jpeg
Nokia
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Botnet
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Nokia company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Techsecure company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Techsecure company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Nokia company.

In the current year, Nokia company has reported more cyber incidents than Techsecure company.

Neither Nokia company nor Techsecure company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Techsecure company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Nokia company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Nokia company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Techsecure company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Techsecure company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Nokia company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Techsecure nor Nokia holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Nokia company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Techsecure company.

Nokia company employs more people globally than Techsecure company, reflecting its scale as a Telecommunications.

Neither Techsecure nor Nokia holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Techsecure nor Nokia holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Techsecure nor Nokia holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Techsecure nor Nokia holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Techsecure nor Nokia holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Techsecure nor Nokia holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X