Comparison Overview

Techsecure

VS

Airtel Africa

Techsecure

None
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

None

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Airtel Africa

The Oval, Ringroad Parklands, Nairobi, Nairobi, KE, 00100
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Airtel Africa is a leading provider of telecommunications and mobile money services, with a presence in 14 countries in Africa, primarily in East Africa and Central and West Africa. Airtel Africa offers an integrated suite of telecommunications solutions to its subscribers, including mobile voice and data services as well as mobile money services both nationally and internationally. The Group aims to continue providing a simple and intuitive customer experience through streamlined customer journeys

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 14,896
Subsidiaries: 18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Techsecure
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/airtel-africa.jpeg
Airtel Africa
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Techsecure
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Airtel Africa
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Techsecure in 2025.

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Airtel Africa in 2025.

Incident History — Techsecure (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Techsecure cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Airtel Africa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Airtel Africa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Techsecure
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Exploited vulnerability in cloud storage service
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2023
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Software Vulnerability
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/airtel-africa.jpeg
Airtel Africa
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Airtel Africa company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Techsecure company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Techsecure company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Airtel Africa company has not reported any.

In the current year, Airtel Africa company and Techsecure company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Airtel Africa company nor Techsecure company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Techsecure company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Airtel Africa company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Airtel Africa company nor Techsecure company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Techsecure company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Airtel Africa company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Techsecure nor Airtel Africa holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Airtel Africa company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Techsecure company.

Airtel Africa company employs more people globally than Techsecure company, reflecting its scale as a Telecommunications.

Neither Techsecure nor Airtel Africa holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Techsecure nor Airtel Africa holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Techsecure nor Airtel Africa holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Techsecure nor Airtel Africa holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Techsecure nor Airtel Africa holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Techsecure nor Airtel Africa holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X