Comparison Overview

TechNOVA

VS

Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA

TechNOVA

Gate House, 1 St John’s Square, London, GB, EC1M 4DH
Last Update: 2025-12-17

TechNOVA delivers strategic insights into the application of cutting edge technology in order for leaders to formulate their own plans. Our conferences, webinars, reports and roundtables deliver thought leadership, networking opportunities and inspiration to those creating a connected world and all businesses that have a place in that ecosystem.

NAICS: 51211
NAICS Definition: Motion Picture and Video Production
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA

Carl-Bertelsmann-Straße 270, Gütersloh, undefined, 33311, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-18

Bertelsmann is a media, services and education company with more than 80,000 employees that operates in about 50 countries around the world. It includes the entertainment group RTL Group, the trade book publisher Penguin Random House, the music company BMG, the service provider Arvato Group, Bertelsmann Marketing Services, the Bertelsmann Education Group and Bertelsmann Investments, an international network of funds. The company generated revenues of €20.2 billion in the 2023 financial year. Bertelsmann stands for creativity and entrepreneurship. This combination promotes first-class media content and innovative service solutions that inspire customers around the world. Bertelsmann aspires to achieve climate neutrality by 2030. www.bertelsmann.com

NAICS: 51211
NAICS Definition: Motion Picture and Video Production
Employees: 19,193
Subsidiaries: 39
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/technova.jpeg
TechNOVA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bertelsmann.jpeg
Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
TechNOVA
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Media Production Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TechNOVA in 2025.

Incidents vs Media Production Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA in 2025.

Incident History — TechNOVA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TechNOVA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/technova.jpeg
TechNOVA
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2023
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bertelsmann.jpeg
Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to TechNOVA company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

TechNOVA company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA company has not reported any.

In the current year, Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA company and TechNOVA company have not reported any cyber incidents.

TechNOVA company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA company nor TechNOVA company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA company nor TechNOVA company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither TechNOVA company nor Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither TechNOVA nor Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to TechNOVA company.

Neither TechNOVA nor Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither TechNOVA nor Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither TechNOVA nor Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither TechNOVA nor Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither TechNOVA nor Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither TechNOVA nor Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N