Comparison Overview

Technopolis Group

VS

Safe Routes Partnership

Technopolis Group

Technopolis Group, Brighton, East Sussex, BN1 1EE, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Technopolis Group is an international research and consulting organisation working for the public sector. Our mission is to help decision-makers understand the complex transitions and systemic changes in our society so they are equipped to take strategic decisions towards a sustainable society, improving policy actions and their communication to the wider society. Starting as a frontrunner in the Science, Technology and Innovation (STI) policy sector, we have grown and diversified our areas of expertise and solutions to SMEs and Industry, Regional Development & Cohesion, Climate Change and Environment, Digital Transformation, Education and Skills, Life Sciences and Health, and International Cooperation. We are working across +60 countries in Europe, Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean, and Asia and the Pacific. Our work ranges from evaluation studies, policy strategy & design, programmes implementation support, monitoring & analytics, and communication for Local and Regional authorities, Governments and Agencies, the European Institutions, International Organisations (UN, MDBs…), NGOs, Research and Innovation organisations, and Public-Private Partnerships.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 302
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Safe Routes Partnership

Fairfax, VA, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

The Safe Routes Partnership is a nonprofit organization working to advance safe walking and rolling to and from schools and in everyday life, improving the health and well-being of people of all races, income levels, and abilities, and building healthy, thriving communities for everyone. The National Partnership is governed by a Board of Directors with staff located throughout the U.S. Our partner affiliates use their communication channels to spread the word about Safe Routes to School opportunities, news, challenges and collaborations. Long time partners include AARP, the National PTA, the American Heart Association, Active Living By Design, Salud America, America Walks, National PTA, ChangeLab Solutions, PolicyLink, Smart Growth America, and PeopleForBikes, to name just a few.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/technopolis-group.jpeg
Technopolis Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/safe-routes-partnership.jpeg
Safe Routes Partnership
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Technopolis Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Safe Routes Partnership
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Technopolis Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Safe Routes Partnership in 2025.

Incident History — Technopolis Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Technopolis Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Safe Routes Partnership (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Safe Routes Partnership cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/technopolis-group.jpeg
Technopolis Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/safe-routes-partnership.jpeg
Safe Routes Partnership
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Technopolis Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Safe Routes Partnership company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Safe Routes Partnership company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Technopolis Group company.

In the current year, Safe Routes Partnership company and Technopolis Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Safe Routes Partnership company nor Technopolis Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Safe Routes Partnership company nor Technopolis Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Safe Routes Partnership company nor Technopolis Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Technopolis Group company nor Safe Routes Partnership company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Technopolis Group nor Safe Routes Partnership holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Technopolis Group company nor Safe Routes Partnership company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Technopolis Group company employs more people globally than Safe Routes Partnership company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Technopolis Group nor Safe Routes Partnership holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Technopolis Group nor Safe Routes Partnership holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Technopolis Group nor Safe Routes Partnership holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Technopolis Group nor Safe Routes Partnership holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Technopolis Group nor Safe Routes Partnership holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Technopolis Group nor Safe Routes Partnership holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H