Comparison Overview

Technology Policy Institute

VS

EuropaNova

Technology Policy Institute

409 12th Street SW, Washington, DC, 20024, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.techpolicyinstitute.org

The Technology Policy Institute is a think tank that focuses on the economics of innovation, technological change, and related regulation in the United States and around the world. Our mission is to advance knowledge and inform policymakers by producing independent, rigorous research and by sponsoring educational programs and conferences on major issues affecting information technology and communications policy. Today’s digital economy may be new, but the economic principles underlying it are not. First principles still matter in both developed and emerging economies. Thus, government should intervene in these dynamic markets only when markets fail and when proposed solutions will demonstrably improve society’s well-being. New technologies can greatly improve standards of living around the globe, but policymakers must carefully consider how policies affect the development of those technologies. Our research will help inform those deliberations. The Technology Policy Institute is a 501(c)(3) research and educational foundation. Check out all our links on LinkTree! https://linktr.ee/techpolicyinstitute

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

EuropaNova

64bis, avenue de New York, Paris, 75016, FR
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749
http://www.europanova.eu/

EuropaNova est une association d intérêt général, fondée en 2003, à l’initiative de Guillaume Klossa, Président, par de jeunes actifs européens souhaitant accélérer la marche vers une puissance publique européenne démocratique, économique et sociale, capable de résister aux crises et aux tentations de repli sur soi, engagée en faveur d’une mondialisation équilibrée respectueuse des individus, des cultures et soucieuse d’un développement durable de la planète Aujourd’hui, son équipe est dirigée par Isabelle Négrier, directrice générale, constituée de jeunes actifs entourés de conseillers plus expérimentés ayant une connaissance en profondeur des institutions européennes et des différentes « parties prenantes ».Malgré une dynamique chaotique, l’Europe demeure le seul laboratoire concret d’une future gouvernance mondiale favorisant plus d’équité, de justice et de responsabilité à l’égard des générations futures. EuropaNova veut contribuer à ce renforcement nécessaire de l’esprit européen, en mettant en œuvre un plan d’actions ambitieux dont l’objectif est double : • peser sur les débats politiques au niveau national et européen, • favoriser l’appropriation du projet européen par les citoyens. EuropaNova entend stimuler le débat d’idées sur l’Europe en nourrissant le débat public par des propositions concrètes, informer et sensibiliser les citoyens sur la construction européenne et ses enjeux. Ses actions visent à mobiliser le public le plus large via des actions originales et innovantes pour promouvoir l’intérêt général européen.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/technology-policy-institute.jpeg
Technology Policy Institute
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/europanova.jpeg
EuropaNova
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Technology Policy Institute
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
EuropaNova
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Technology Policy Institute in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EuropaNova in 2025.

Incident History — Technology Policy Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Technology Policy Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — EuropaNova (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EuropaNova cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/technology-policy-institute.jpeg
Technology Policy Institute
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/europanova.jpeg
EuropaNova
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Technology Policy Institute company and EuropaNova company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, EuropaNova company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Technology Policy Institute company.

In the current year, EuropaNova company and Technology Policy Institute company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither EuropaNova company nor Technology Policy Institute company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither EuropaNova company nor Technology Policy Institute company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither EuropaNova company nor Technology Policy Institute company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Technology Policy Institute company nor EuropaNova company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Technology Policy Institute nor EuropaNova holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Technology Policy Institute company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to EuropaNova company.

Both Technology Policy Institute company and EuropaNova company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither Technology Policy Institute nor EuropaNova holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Technology Policy Institute nor EuropaNova holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Technology Policy Institute nor EuropaNova holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Technology Policy Institute nor EuropaNova holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Technology Policy Institute nor EuropaNova holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Technology Policy Institute nor EuropaNova holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
References
Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
References
Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References