Comparison Overview

Technology Leaders Club

VS

GCRG

Technology Leaders Club

Bath, BA1 1RG, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-01

The Technology Leaders Club, part of Rela8 Group, is the home to the authentic voice of the tech community. TLC is a sales-free platform where Technology Leaders can gather, share insights, and connect with each other in meaningful ways. Our community of over 10,000 tech executives have priority access to a range of networking and roundtable events, as well as exclusive access to our library of whitepapers, interviews, expert Q&A’s, and much more. Created for, and driven by, the Tech community, the Technology Leaders Club is the jewel in Rela8 Group’s crown.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

GCRG

Office 404, 4th Floor, London, W1B 3HH, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 800 and 849

www.thegcrg.com GLOBAL CENTRE FOR RENEWAL AND GUIDANCE -GCRG ‘An independent policy and research institute focusing on contempory muslim affairs in the west’ VISION “To investigate, re-appraise, focus, and present a scholarly Islamic response to emerging contemporary issues so that the whole of mankind benefits from the experience.” ABOUT GCRG The GCRG is an independent educational charity established to carry out research, publish, and collect resources on Islam and for the scholarly training of young Muslims. It is a think-tank committed to the notion that Islam has much to offer our troubled and challenged world. The GCRG believes that the whole of humanity deserves to benefit from the faith’s teachings, experience, and philosophy. A primary objective of the GCRG is to share the Islamic message of harmony, justice, balance, and humanity – and to harness its civilizing potential.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/technology-leaders-club.jpeg
Technology Leaders Club
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
GCRG
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Technology Leaders Club
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
GCRG
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Technology Leaders Club in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GCRG in 2025.

Incident History — Technology Leaders Club (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Technology Leaders Club cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — GCRG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GCRG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/technology-leaders-club.jpeg
Technology Leaders Club
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
GCRG
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

GCRG company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Technology Leaders Club company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, GCRG company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Technology Leaders Club company.

In the current year, GCRG company and Technology Leaders Club company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither GCRG company nor Technology Leaders Club company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither GCRG company nor Technology Leaders Club company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither GCRG company nor Technology Leaders Club company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Technology Leaders Club company nor GCRG company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Technology Leaders Club nor GCRG holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Technology Leaders Club company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to GCRG company.

GCRG company employs more people globally than Technology Leaders Club company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Technology Leaders Club nor GCRG holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Technology Leaders Club nor GCRG holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Technology Leaders Club nor GCRG holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Technology Leaders Club nor GCRG holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Technology Leaders Club nor GCRG holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Technology Leaders Club nor GCRG holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X