Comparison Overview

Technolink

VS

Vibrant Networks

Technolink

Fuzuli str 49, Baku, AZ
Last Update: 2025-11-21
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.technolink.az

Technolink is the IT company in Azerbaijan Market. Official distributor of Q-matic company. Helping to Financial, Heath. Retail and Government (Public) sector to solve the problem with big Q lines. Giving CFM solution which is useful for the future business and marketing activities with customer. With the services by Technolin and Q-Matic our customers can serve their customer at the high level and more professionally.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 41
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Vibrant Networks

Grove House, Grove Terrace, Walsall, England, GB, WS12NE
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799
http://www.vibrant-networks.co.uk

At Vibrant Networks, we believe in making your IT work for you! Our team of experienced IT specialists are here to make sure you can get the most out of your setup. With nearly 20 years of experience, we at Vibrant Networks are dedicated to helping our clients run smoothly on a system that’s tailored to their businesses’ needs. Our key services include: • Cyber Security - incident response and training • Network server installation/virtualisation • Office 365 Migrations • Relocations • Wi-Fi Network Installation & Design • CAT5 and CAT6 Data cabling • VoIP Telephone Systems • Procurement • Hardware and Software Upgrades Based in Walsall, we’ve helped over 200 clients all over the West Midlands and the UK with their IT. Whether you’re an SME or a larger corporation, give us a call to see how we can make your IT work for you.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/technolink.jpeg
Technolink
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vibrant-networks-ltd.jpeg
Vibrant Networks
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Technolink
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Vibrant Networks
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Technolink in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Vibrant Networks in 2025.

Incident History — Technolink (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Technolink cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Vibrant Networks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Vibrant Networks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/technolink.jpeg
Technolink
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vibrant-networks-ltd.jpeg
Vibrant Networks
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Technolink company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Vibrant Networks company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Vibrant Networks company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Technolink company.

In the current year, Vibrant Networks company and Technolink company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Vibrant Networks company nor Technolink company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Vibrant Networks company nor Technolink company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Vibrant Networks company nor Technolink company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Technolink company nor Vibrant Networks company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Technolink nor Vibrant Networks holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Technolink company nor Vibrant Networks company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Technolink company employs more people globally than Vibrant Networks company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither Technolink nor Vibrant Networks holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Technolink nor Vibrant Networks holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Technolink nor Vibrant Networks holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Technolink nor Vibrant Networks holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Technolink nor Vibrant Networks holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Technolink nor Vibrant Networks holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References