Comparison Overview

TechnipFMC

VS

Sonatrach

TechnipFMC

Hadrian House, Wincomblee Road, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE6 3PL, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-20
Between 750 and 799

TechnipFMC is a leading technology provider to the traditional and new energies industry, delivering fully integrated projects, products, and services. With our proprietary technologies and comprehensive solutions, we are transforming our clients’ project economics, helping them unlock new possibilities to develop energy resources while reducing carbon intensity and supporting their energy transition ambitions. Organized in two business segments — Subsea and Surface Technologies — we will continue to advance the industry with our pioneering integrated ecosystems (such as iEPCI™, iFEED™ and iComplete™), technology leadership and digital innovation. Each of our approximately 20,000 employees is driven by a commitment to our clients’ success, and a culture of strong execution, purposeful innovation, and challenging industry conventions. To learn more about us and how we are enhancing the performance of the world’s energy industry, go to TechnipFMC.com.

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 38,099
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Sonatrach

Djenane El Malik, Hydra, 16035, DZ
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

Sonatrach (Société Nationale pour la Recherche, la Production, le Transport, la Transformation, et la Commercialisation des Hydrocarbures s.p.a.) is an Algerian government-owned company formed to exploit the hydrocarbon resources of the country. Its diversified activities cover all aspects of Oil & Gas industry chain. Upstream (E&P), Midstream (Transport) and Downstream (Marketing, Refining and Petchems).

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 45,447
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/technipfmc.jpeg
TechnipFMC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sonatrach.jpeg
Sonatrach
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
TechnipFMC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sonatrach
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TechnipFMC in 2026.

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sonatrach in 2026.

Incident History — TechnipFMC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TechnipFMC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sonatrach (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sonatrach cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/technipfmc.jpeg
TechnipFMC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sonatrach.jpeg
Sonatrach
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sonatrach company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to TechnipFMC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Sonatrach company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to TechnipFMC company.

In the current year, Sonatrach company and TechnipFMC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sonatrach company nor TechnipFMC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sonatrach company nor TechnipFMC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sonatrach company nor TechnipFMC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither TechnipFMC company nor Sonatrach company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither TechnipFMC nor Sonatrach holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

TechnipFMC company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Sonatrach company.

Sonatrach company employs more people globally than TechnipFMC company, reflecting its scale as a Oil and Gas.

Neither TechnipFMC nor Sonatrach holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither TechnipFMC nor Sonatrach holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither TechnipFMC nor Sonatrach holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither TechnipFMC nor Sonatrach holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither TechnipFMC nor Sonatrach holds HIPAA certification.

Neither TechnipFMC nor Sonatrach holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.