Comparison Overview

AgInnovate / TechInnovate

VS

The University of Alabama

AgInnovate / TechInnovate

Last Update: 2025-11-20

The TechInnovate/AgInnovate entrepreneurship development programmes at NUI Galway teach industry professionals how to create a startup company or a new business subsidiary. This is achieved through our postgraduate programmes, whereby professionals learn the process and skills required to be an entrepreneur/founder or to be intrapreneurial within existing enterprises. TechInnovate is a forum which combines resources to catalyse and lead technology innovation by: - Delivering the next generation of specially trained and skilled graduates to the technology marketplace. - Identifying new product development opportunities. - Providing, developing and proposing commercial opportunities to move an identified domain need forward. - Provide research opportunities and spin-out companies in collaboration with domain experts and partnering companies. - Building a technology innovation ecosystem that can deliver internationally.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
7
Attack type number
4

The University of Alabama

739 University Blvd, Tuscaloosa, al, 35487-0166, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

The University of Alabama is a student-centered research university and an academic community committed to enhancing the quality of life for all through breakthrough research. Founded in 1831 as Alabama's first public college, The University of Alabama is dedicated to excellence in teaching, research and service. Our campus is a creative environment where students and scholars are equipped to become their best. Taught by leading faculty in their fields, our students make a positive impact in the community, the state and the world. UA’s history of success sets an expectation of greatness for the future. That is an expectation we will deliver. The University of Alabama is an Equal Employment/Equal Educational Opportunity Institution. All qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, pregnancy, age, genetic or family medical history information, disability, protected veteran status, or any other legally protected basis, and will not be discriminated against because of their protected status. Applicants to and employees of this institution are protected under Federal law from discrimination on several bases.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 12,315
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/techinnovate.jpeg
AgInnovate / TechInnovate
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-alabama.jpeg
The University of Alabama
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
AgInnovate / TechInnovate
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The University of Alabama
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AgInnovate / TechInnovate in 2025.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The University of Alabama in 2025.

Incident History — AgInnovate / TechInnovate (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AgInnovate / TechInnovate cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The University of Alabama (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The University of Alabama cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/techinnovate.jpeg
AgInnovate / TechInnovate
Incidents

Date Detected: 08/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Exploitation of vulnerability in MOVEit file transfer software
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 07/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Malware and Data Leak
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 07/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Exploitation of vulnerabilities in MOVEit file transfer software
Motivation: Unauthorized access and dissemination of highly sensitive intellectual property
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-alabama.jpeg
The University of Alabama
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2009
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Login
Blog: Blog

FAQ

The University of Alabama company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to AgInnovate / TechInnovate company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

AgInnovate / TechInnovate company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to The University of Alabama company.

In the current year, The University of Alabama company and AgInnovate / TechInnovate company have not reported any cyber incidents.

AgInnovate / TechInnovate company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while The University of Alabama company has not reported such incidents publicly.

AgInnovate / TechInnovate company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other The University of Alabama company has not reported such incidents publicly.

AgInnovate / TechInnovate company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while The University of Alabama company has not reported such incidents publicly.

AgInnovate / TechInnovate company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while The University of Alabama company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither AgInnovate / TechInnovate nor The University of Alabama holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

The University of Alabama company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to AgInnovate / TechInnovate company.

The University of Alabama company employs more people globally than AgInnovate / TechInnovate company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither AgInnovate / TechInnovate nor The University of Alabama holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither AgInnovate / TechInnovate nor The University of Alabama holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither AgInnovate / TechInnovate nor The University of Alabama holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither AgInnovate / TechInnovate nor The University of Alabama holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither AgInnovate / TechInnovate nor The University of Alabama holds HIPAA certification.

Neither AgInnovate / TechInnovate nor The University of Alabama holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H