Comparison Overview

Tech Policy Press

VS

4rfv

Tech Policy Press

PO Box 90173, Austin, TX, US, 78709
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Our goal is to provoke new ideas, debate and discussion at the intersection of technology, democracy and policy, with a particular focus on: • Concentrations of power: the interaction of tech platforms, governments and the media and the future of the public sphere; • Geopolitics of technology: how nation states approach technology in the pursuit of advantage; • Technology and the economy: the relationship between markets, business, and labor; • Racism, bigotry, violence & oppression: how tech exacerbates or solves such challenges; • Ethics of Technology: how technology should be viewed alongside existing democratic ethos, especially with regard to privacy, surveillance and personal freedoms; • Election integrity & participation: mechanisms of democracy, problems such as disinformation and how citizens come to consensus. Opinions do not reflect the views of Tech Policy Press. Reposts do not equal endorsements.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

4rfv

None
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

www.4rfv.co.uk is one of the largest on-line directory's in the film and television industry in UK and Ireland. We are gaining over 110,000 Unique visitors (all stats electronically ABC audited) making us by far the biggest site in this industry in terms of visitors. We also have approx 70% of our categories appearing in the top ten searches on google!

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tech-policy-press.jpeg
Tech Policy Press
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/4rfv.jpeg
4rfv
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Tech Policy Press
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
4rfv
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tech Policy Press in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 4rfv in 2025.

Incident History — Tech Policy Press (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tech Policy Press cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — 4rfv (X = Date, Y = Severity)

4rfv cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tech-policy-press.jpeg
Tech Policy Press
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/4rfv.jpeg
4rfv
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

4rfv company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tech Policy Press company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, 4rfv company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Tech Policy Press company.

In the current year, 4rfv company and Tech Policy Press company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither 4rfv company nor Tech Policy Press company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither 4rfv company nor Tech Policy Press company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither 4rfv company nor Tech Policy Press company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Tech Policy Press company nor 4rfv company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Tech Policy Press nor 4rfv holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Tech Policy Press company nor 4rfv company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Tech Policy Press company employs more people globally than 4rfv company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Tech Policy Press nor 4rfv holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Tech Policy Press nor 4rfv holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Tech Policy Press nor 4rfv holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Tech Policy Press nor 4rfv holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Tech Policy Press nor 4rfv holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Tech Policy Press nor 4rfv holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.