Comparison Overview

Tech Mahindra

VS

Stefanini Brasil

Tech Mahindra

Erandwane, Pune, Maharashtra, IN, 411004
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 750 and 799

Tech Mahindra offers technology consulting and digital solutions to global enterprises across industries, enabling transformative scale at unparalleled speed. With 150,000+ professionals across 90+ countries helping 1100+ clients, TechM provides a full spectrum of services including consulting, information technology, enterprise applications, business process services, engineering services, network services, customer experience & design services, AI & analytics, and cloud & infrastructure services. It is the first Indian company in the world to have been awarded the Sustainable Markets Initiative’s Terra Carta Seal, in recognition of actively leading the charge to create a climate and nature-positive future. Tech Mahindra (NSE: TECHM) is part of the Mahindra Group, founded in 1945, one of the largest and most admired multinational federations of companies. Visit www.techmahindra.com to #ScaleAtSpeed

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 149,256
Subsidiaries: 14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Stefanini Brasil

AV JAGUARY 164, JAGUARIUNA, SP, JAGUARIUNA, BR
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

A Stefanini é uma multinacional brasileira que atua no setor de serviços em TI. Com um suporte em mais de 30 idiomas, a Stefanini, 5ª empresa mais internacionalizada, segundo a Fundação Dom Cabral, atua em mais de 35 países e e está entre as 100 maiores empresas de TI do mundo (BBC News). Uma das mais importantes provedoras globais de soluções de negócios baseadas em tecnologia oferece prestação de serviços em Consultoria, Integração, Desenvolvimento de Soluções, BPO, Outsourcing para Aplicativos e Infraestrutura, entre outras soluções.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 12,159
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tech-mahindra.jpeg
Tech Mahindra
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stefanini-brasil.jpeg
Stefanini Brasil
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Tech Mahindra
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Stefanini Brasil
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tech Mahindra in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stefanini Brasil in 2025.

Incident History — Tech Mahindra (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tech Mahindra cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Stefanini Brasil (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stefanini Brasil cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tech-mahindra.jpeg
Tech Mahindra
Incidents

Date Detected: 04/2017
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Unauthorized changes
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stefanini-brasil.jpeg
Stefanini Brasil
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Stefanini Brasil company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tech Mahindra company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Tech Mahindra company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Stefanini Brasil company has not reported any.

In the current year, Stefanini Brasil company and Tech Mahindra company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Stefanini Brasil company nor Tech Mahindra company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Stefanini Brasil company nor Tech Mahindra company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Stefanini Brasil company nor Tech Mahindra company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Tech Mahindra company nor Stefanini Brasil company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Tech Mahindra nor Stefanini Brasil holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Tech Mahindra company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Stefanini Brasil company.

Tech Mahindra company employs more people globally than Stefanini Brasil company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Tech Mahindra nor Stefanini Brasil holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Tech Mahindra nor Stefanini Brasil holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Tech Mahindra nor Stefanini Brasil holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Tech Mahindra nor Stefanini Brasil holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Tech Mahindra nor Stefanini Brasil holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Tech Mahindra nor Stefanini Brasil holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H