Comparison Overview

Teatro dell'Opera di Roma

VS

De Firma Zorgbehang

Teatro dell'Opera di Roma

None
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.operaroma.it/

One of the most important Opera Theatres in the world, the Teatro dell’Opera di Roma is the guardian of one of the greatest Italian artistic traditions, under the Honorary Direction of Maestro Riccardo Muti. Founded in the heart of Rome in 1880, it offers a wide range of Operas, Ballets and Concerts and welcomes people from all over the world. At Summer the performances move to the magnificent monumental complex of Caracalla's Baths.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 368
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

De Firma Zorgbehang

Utrechtseweg 310, Arnhem, 6812 AR, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-15
Between 750 and 799
http://www.defirmazorgbehang.nl

Wij zijn een groep semi-professionele acteurs, die theater maken vanuit improvisaties, waarbij onze eigen ervaringen op het gebied van de geestelijke gezondheidszorg een bron van inspiratie zijn. Soms maken we gebruik van input van organisaties en andere ervaringsdeskundigen om een onderwerp verder uit te diepen. Zo geven wij op een unieke wijze een andere kijk op de GGZ. We doorbreken taboes en maken zichtbaar én invoelbaar, wat normaal 'achter het behang'​ blijft plakken in de huiskamers en zorginstellingen. We werken interdisciplinair, waarbij muziek, (fysiek-) theater, beeld en persoonlijke verhalen worden samengebracht tot voorstellingen die raken. Hierbij spelen herkenning, verschillende perspectieven en humor een grote rol. We spelen overal en voor iedereen. Op instellingen, festivals, congressen of in het theater Ons publiek varieert dan ook van cliënt tot beleidsmedewerker, van theaterliefhebber tot zorgprofessional. Naast onze te boeken voorstellingen zijn we ook inzetbaar voor pauze acts, ontvangsttheater, het verzorgen van educatief programma en workshops op maat.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/teatro-dell'opera-di-roma.jpeg
Teatro dell'Opera di Roma
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/de-firma-zorgbehang.jpeg
De Firma Zorgbehang
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Teatro dell'Opera di Roma
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
De Firma Zorgbehang
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Teatro dell'Opera di Roma in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for De Firma Zorgbehang in 2025.

Incident History — Teatro dell'Opera di Roma (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Teatro dell'Opera di Roma cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — De Firma Zorgbehang (X = Date, Y = Severity)

De Firma Zorgbehang cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/teatro-dell'opera-di-roma.jpeg
Teatro dell'Opera di Roma
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/de-firma-zorgbehang.jpeg
De Firma Zorgbehang
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Teatro dell'Opera di Roma company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to De Firma Zorgbehang company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, De Firma Zorgbehang company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Teatro dell'Opera di Roma company.

In the current year, De Firma Zorgbehang company and Teatro dell'Opera di Roma company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither De Firma Zorgbehang company nor Teatro dell'Opera di Roma company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither De Firma Zorgbehang company nor Teatro dell'Opera di Roma company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither De Firma Zorgbehang company nor Teatro dell'Opera di Roma company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Teatro dell'Opera di Roma company nor De Firma Zorgbehang company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Teatro dell'Opera di Roma nor De Firma Zorgbehang holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Teatro dell'Opera di Roma company nor De Firma Zorgbehang company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Teatro dell'Opera di Roma company employs more people globally than De Firma Zorgbehang company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Teatro dell'Opera di Roma nor De Firma Zorgbehang holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Teatro dell'Opera di Roma nor De Firma Zorgbehang holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Teatro dell'Opera di Roma nor De Firma Zorgbehang holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Teatro dell'Opera di Roma nor De Firma Zorgbehang holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Teatro dell'Opera di Roma nor De Firma Zorgbehang holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Teatro dell'Opera di Roma nor De Firma Zorgbehang holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References