Comparison Overview

TEAMEPS

VS

Mepco Label Systems

TEAMEPS

None
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.teameps.com

For more than 21 years, TeamEPS has delivered on a promise: fast, dependable service for a wide range of prepress imaging systems from the world’s leading manufacturers of platesetters and print-on-demand solutions. As the largest, privately-owned and operated platesetter service provider in the United States, TeamEPS has serviced more than 1,000 customers around the world, helping them gain the maximum productivity, reliability and longevity from their prepress systems. TeamEPS partners with the world’s leading manufacturers and dealers to provide exceptional system service and support.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Mepco Label Systems

1313 S. Stockton Street, Lodi, CA, 95240, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mepcolabel.com

Mepco Label Systems production capabilities are based on customer needs. If a customer makes a request for a new product, Mepco will create a new process to get the job done. Mepco is committed to the protection of the environment while at the same time delivering the highest quality and most cost effective production output. We work closely with not only our customers but also with our suppliers to increase our production and our capabilities. Mepco operates under an integrated production and distribution system made possible by our total in-house production and graphics facility. Mepco label systems have been located in Stockton, California since 1912, and just recently relocated to a larger facility in Lodi, CA. We perform every facet of the manufacturing process with the latest in Hi-tech equipment. Our graphics department utilizes a specialized flexo printing software for proofing and color separation. We have color scanners and proofing printers as well as color separation equipment. All of our digital plates are manufactured on the premises with environmentally safe processes and equipment. In keeping with our stated goal of TOTAL CUSTOMER SATISFACTION, it is Mepco's mission to provide customers with the highest level of service, quality, and competitive rates. Mepco strives to increase the quality of a customer's product while increasing product value.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 45
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/teameps.jpeg
TEAMEPS
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mepco-label-systems.jpeg
Mepco Label Systems
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
TEAMEPS
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mepco Label Systems
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TEAMEPS in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mepco Label Systems in 2025.

Incident History — TEAMEPS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TEAMEPS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mepco Label Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mepco Label Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/teameps.jpeg
TEAMEPS
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mepco-label-systems.jpeg
Mepco Label Systems
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

TEAMEPS company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Mepco Label Systems company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Mepco Label Systems company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to TEAMEPS company.

In the current year, Mepco Label Systems company and TEAMEPS company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mepco Label Systems company nor TEAMEPS company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Mepco Label Systems company nor TEAMEPS company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Mepco Label Systems company nor TEAMEPS company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither TEAMEPS company nor Mepco Label Systems company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither TEAMEPS nor Mepco Label Systems holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither TEAMEPS company nor Mepco Label Systems company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Mepco Label Systems company employs more people globally than TEAMEPS company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither TEAMEPS nor Mepco Label Systems holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither TEAMEPS nor Mepco Label Systems holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither TEAMEPS nor Mepco Label Systems holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither TEAMEPS nor Mepco Label Systems holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither TEAMEPS nor Mepco Label Systems holds HIPAA certification.

Neither TEAMEPS nor Mepco Label Systems holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References