Comparison Overview

Team Corporation

VS

Applus+ AC6

Team Corporation

11591 Watertank Rd., Burlington, Washington, 98233, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Team Corporation designs, builds and delivers high-performance single and multi-axis vibration and shock test systems – as well as related components. The advent of vibration technology has resulted in the steady improvement in product quality, reliability, passenger comfort, and public safety. Vibration testing has become indispensable in assuring product quality, and Team Corporation, the pioneer and quality leader in this exacting field, has become the most trusted name in vibration testing. Since 1954, Team Corporation has contributed to the development of the world’s most advanced space, automotive, rail transportation, electronics, defense, packaging, telecommunications, seismic and oil exploration programs.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Applus+ AC6

Polígono Comarca 1, Orkoien, Navarra, 31160, ES
Last Update: 2025-11-22

AC6 Metrology S.L. It was acquired by Applus + Laboratories. To see what's new, visit Applus + Laboratories. AC6 Metrology S.L. is a company specialized in integral metrology services. We attend to the calibration needs of companies that want to guarantee the traceability of the measures they carry out through inspection, measurement and testing equipment. We offer our service both in our facilities and in the facilities of our clients (on site). Our calibration laboratory is accredited by ENAC to calibrate the following magnitudes: Dimensional Electricity Pressure and vacuum Temperature and Humidity Force Moment Hardness Dough

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/team-corporation.jpeg
Team Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/applus-ac6.jpeg
Applus+ AC6
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Team Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Applus+ AC6
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Team Corporation in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Applus+ AC6 in 2025.

Incident History — Team Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Team Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Applus+ AC6 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Applus+ AC6 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/team-corporation.jpeg
Team Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/applus-ac6.jpeg
Applus+ AC6
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Team Corporation company and Applus+ AC6 company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Applus+ AC6 company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Team Corporation company.

In the current year, Applus+ AC6 company and Team Corporation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Applus+ AC6 company nor Team Corporation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Applus+ AC6 company nor Team Corporation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Applus+ AC6 company nor Team Corporation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Team Corporation company nor Applus+ AC6 company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Team Corporation nor Applus+ AC6 holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Applus+ AC6 company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Team Corporation company.

Team Corporation company employs more people globally than Applus+ AC6 company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Team Corporation nor Applus+ AC6 holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Team Corporation nor Applus+ AC6 holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Team Corporation nor Applus+ AC6 holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Team Corporation nor Applus+ AC6 holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Team Corporation nor Applus+ AC6 holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Team Corporation nor Applus+ AC6 holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H