Comparison Overview

TD SYNNEX

VS

FIS

TD SYNNEX

44201 Nobel Dr, Fremont, California, US, 94538
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 750 and 799

We’re TD SYNNEX (NYSE: SNX), a leading distributor and solutions aggregator for the IT ecosystem. We’re 23,000 of the IT industry’s best and brightest, who share an unwavering passion for bringing compelling technology products, services and solutions to the world. We’re an innovative partner that helps our customers maximize the value of IT investments, demonstrate business outcomes and unlock growth opportunities. At our core, we’re a company that cares. We care about our partners, our co-workers, our investors and the world around us. And we’re committed to being a diverse, inclusive employer of choice and a good corporate citizen.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 20,572
Subsidiaries: 26
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

FIS

601 Riverside Ave, None, Jacksonville, FL, US, 32202
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 800 and 849

Unlocking financial technology. Bringing the world’s money into harmony. At FIS, we advance the way the world pays, banks, and invests. With decades of expertise, we provide financial technology solutions to financial institutions, businesses, and developers. Headquartered in Jacksonville, Florida, we’re a proud member of the Fortune 500® and the Standard & Poor’s 500® Index. Let's innovate together.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 46,189
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tdsynnex.jpeg
TD SYNNEX
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fis.jpeg
FIS
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
TD SYNNEX
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
FIS
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TD SYNNEX in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FIS in 2025.

Incident History — TD SYNNEX (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TD SYNNEX cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — FIS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FIS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tdsynnex.jpeg
TD SYNNEX
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fis.jpeg
FIS
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2023
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Software Vulnerability
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2023
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Software Vulnerability
Blog: Blog

FAQ

FIS company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to TD SYNNEX company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

FIS company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas TD SYNNEX company has not reported any.

In the current year, FIS company and TD SYNNEX company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither FIS company nor TD SYNNEX company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither FIS company nor TD SYNNEX company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither FIS company nor TD SYNNEX company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

FIS company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while TD SYNNEX company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither TD SYNNEX nor FIS holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

TD SYNNEX company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to FIS company.

FIS company employs more people globally than TD SYNNEX company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither TD SYNNEX nor FIS holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither TD SYNNEX nor FIS holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither TD SYNNEX nor FIS holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither TD SYNNEX nor FIS holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither TD SYNNEX nor FIS holds HIPAA certification.

Neither TD SYNNEX nor FIS holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H