Comparison Overview

MedLit Solutions

VS

Trend Offset Printing

MedLit Solutions

191 Technology Drive, Garner, North Carolina, 27529, US
Last Update: 2025-12-19
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://medlitsolutions.com/

With over 25 years in business at MedLit Solutions, a Resource Label Group company, we are delivering customer-centric award winning custom print and packaging solutions meeting our customer’s needs. TCG Legacy offers a broad range of graphics, print and packaging services for all industries. Our approach is to custom configure our deliverables for each customer so that their unique needs and business challenges are addressed with high quality, consistent solutions. Our state of the art facility operates 24 hrs/6 days a week. Our use of the most sophisticated equipment combined with our experienced team of professionals has enabled us to dramatically increase our offerings and produce jobs more efficiently than our competition. We understand that printing is both an art and a science. Our many years of experience and appreciation for the process allow us to influence the artistic aspect, while our use of the most advanced technologies enable us to efficiently produce the highest quality projects possible.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 69
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Trend Offset Printing

3701 Catalina St., Los Alamitos, CA, 90720, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://www.trendoffset.com

As one of the leading full-service commercial printers in North America, we specialize in web offset and digital printing of publications; magazines, catalogs, advertising and direct mail. Our plants are strategically located in Los Alamitos, California (company headquarters); Carrollton, Texas (suburban Dallas); and Jacksonville, Florida We have created a national platform of customer-focused print solutions by replicating our best practices at our plants across the country.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 422
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tcg-legacy-printing-&-packaging.jpeg
MedLit Solutions
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/trend-offset-printing.jpeg
Trend Offset Printing
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
MedLit Solutions
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Trend Offset Printing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MedLit Solutions in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Trend Offset Printing in 2025.

Incident History — MedLit Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MedLit Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Trend Offset Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Trend Offset Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tcg-legacy-printing-&-packaging.jpeg
MedLit Solutions
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/trend-offset-printing.jpeg
Trend Offset Printing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Trend Offset Printing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to MedLit Solutions company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Trend Offset Printing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to MedLit Solutions company.

In the current year, Trend Offset Printing company and MedLit Solutions company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Trend Offset Printing company nor MedLit Solutions company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Trend Offset Printing company nor MedLit Solutions company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Trend Offset Printing company nor MedLit Solutions company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither MedLit Solutions company nor Trend Offset Printing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither MedLit Solutions nor Trend Offset Printing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Trend Offset Printing company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to MedLit Solutions company.

Trend Offset Printing company employs more people globally than MedLit Solutions company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither MedLit Solutions nor Trend Offset Printing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither MedLit Solutions nor Trend Offset Printing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither MedLit Solutions nor Trend Offset Printing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither MedLit Solutions nor Trend Offset Printing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither MedLit Solutions nor Trend Offset Printing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither MedLit Solutions nor Trend Offset Printing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Authorization (CWE-285) in Kibana can lead to privilege escalation (CAPEC-233) by allowing an authenticated user to bypass intended permission restrictions via a crafted HTTP request. This allows an attacker who lacks the live queries - read permission to successfully retrieve the list of live queries.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Weblate is a web based localization tool. In versions prior to 5.15.1, it was possible to overwrite Git configuration remotely and override some of its behavior. Version 5.15.1 fixes the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Elasticsearch can allow an authenticated user with snapshot restore privileges to cause Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130) of memory and a denial of service (DoS) via crafted HTTP request.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Kibana can allow a low-privileged authenticated user to cause Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130) of computing resources and a denial of service (DoS) of the Kibana process via a crafted HTTP request.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('Cross-site Scripting') (CWE-79) allows an unauthenticated user to embed a malicious script in content that will be served to web browsers causing cross-site scripting (XSS) (CAPEC-63) via a vulnerability a function handler in the Vega AST evaluator.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
References