Comparison Overview

MedLit Solutions

VS

Swift Print Communications

MedLit Solutions

191 Technology Drive, Garner, North Carolina, 27529, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

With over 25 years in business at MedLit Solutions, a Resource Label Group company, we are delivering customer-centric award winning custom print and packaging solutions meeting our customer’s needs. TCG Legacy offers a broad range of graphics, print and packaging services for all industries. Our approach is to custom configure our deliverables for each customer so that their unique needs and business challenges are addressed with high quality, consistent solutions. Our state of the art facility operates 24 hrs/6 days a week. Our use of the most sophisticated equipment combined with our experienced team of professionals has enabled us to dramatically increase our offerings and produce jobs more efficiently than our competition. We understand that printing is both an art and a science. Our many years of experience and appreciation for the process allow us to influence the artistic aspect, while our use of the most advanced technologies enable us to efficiently produce the highest quality projects possible.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 69
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Swift Print Communications

1248 Research Blvd, Saint Louis, Missouri, 63132, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Swift Print Communications is proud to announce that we’ve completed another record February of Insurance Annual Reports. In just 29 days we produced more than 5000 offset plates, printed, and bound the annual reports and shipped them out in record numbers. We’ve been doing this every February for over 80 years!! Our Oce'​ is almost 3 months old!! YOU should see some of the beautiful large format banners, window clings, sintra boards, scrim and foam core we are producing!! Please let us know if you would like to come for a demo or would like a sample!! In our continued effort to understand our customers’ needs we’re asking you, how does your company utilize Grand Format printing to help meet your marketing objectives and what are your biggest complaints in dealing these type of projects? Heard a really neat statistic today that we are proud of and just had to share it with everyone. Swift Print Communications has properly delivered a weekly mail piece for one of our clients for over 4000 straight weeks. Let us know if you would like to discuss establishing this type of long-term relationship.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 61
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tcg-legacy-printing-&-packaging.jpeg
MedLit Solutions
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/swift-print-communications.jpeg
Swift Print Communications
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
MedLit Solutions
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Swift Print Communications
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MedLit Solutions in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Swift Print Communications in 2025.

Incident History — MedLit Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MedLit Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Swift Print Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Swift Print Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tcg-legacy-printing-&-packaging.jpeg
MedLit Solutions
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/swift-print-communications.jpeg
Swift Print Communications
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both MedLit Solutions company and Swift Print Communications company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Swift Print Communications company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to MedLit Solutions company.

In the current year, Swift Print Communications company and MedLit Solutions company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Swift Print Communications company nor MedLit Solutions company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Swift Print Communications company nor MedLit Solutions company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Swift Print Communications company nor MedLit Solutions company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither MedLit Solutions company nor Swift Print Communications company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither MedLit Solutions nor Swift Print Communications holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither MedLit Solutions company nor Swift Print Communications company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

MedLit Solutions company employs more people globally than Swift Print Communications company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither MedLit Solutions nor Swift Print Communications holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither MedLit Solutions nor Swift Print Communications holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither MedLit Solutions nor Swift Print Communications holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither MedLit Solutions nor Swift Print Communications holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither MedLit Solutions nor Swift Print Communications holds HIPAA certification.

Neither MedLit Solutions nor Swift Print Communications holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L