Comparison Overview

TCC Group Holdings(台泥企業團)

VS

Knauf

TCC Group Holdings(台泥企業團)

台北市中山區中山北路二段113號 台北市, 台灣 104, TW
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

TCC Group Holdings was established in year 1946 and be a leading cement play in Taiwan. Major scope of operation includes manufacturing and sales of cement, cement products and ready mix concrete. In year 2014, the company’s capacity in great China is about 60 million tons and ranked # 6 (from ccement.com). TCC is also a global major export and the quality was highly recognized internationally and certified by Los Angeles City and CE in Eurozone. Currently, TCC cement capacities locate in Guangdong, Guangxi, Jiangsu, Laioning, Sichuan, Chongqing, Yunnan China and Hoping, Suao and Hualein Taiwan. Besides that, there are grinders in Anhui, Guangxi and Fujian. There are 16 cement plants, 3 grinders, 22 RMC plants and one cement specific port in Taiwan and China. To fulfill “Environmental is responsibility but not cost” belief and to endeavor for social duty,TCC Group Holdings involves in power, waste accessing business and to be a “cement, power, environmental” core driven enterprise. The R&D center in Taoyuan, Taiwan makes every effort on product and procedure innovation. Vision Raise the life quality in full aspects The final vision of the company is to raise the life quality in full aspects. Via “cement, power, environmental” core driven platform, we not only provide excellent service and products, but also reduce the impact to environment and energy via manufacturing technology. We do contribute the solution for global warming via CCS technology. TCC develops potential qualified management human resource to realize balance between benefit and honest. TCC also set up Koo Foundation and Dr. Cecilia Koo Botanic Conservation Center to push cultural communication across straits and maintain the variety of plants reservation. TCC Group Holdings feedbacks society via products, service, R&D, human resource, culture and environmental with continuous innovation to raise the life quality.

NAICS: 4233
NAICS Definition: Lumber and Other Construction Materials Merchant Wholesalers
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Knauf

Am Bahnhof 7, Iphofen, undefined, D-97346, DE
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 700 and 749

Everyone sees opportunity differently. Knauf sees opportunity in everyone. Similar to other global businesses, our 41,500 team members in 90 countries across 300 sites provide a huge opportunity for anyone with ambition and energy. Unlike other global businesses, you may be surprised that Knauf is still a family-owned and run company and that means that our values and people-first culture are at the forefront of how the business operates. This means that career with us can offer you something a bit special; family values at the heart combined with global success and influence. Founded in 1932, we are one of the world’s leading manufacturers of construction materials for interior design, building insulation, and design ceilings. We are made up of 4 core divisions and our plants across the globe produce state-of-the-art drywall systems, plasters, and insulating materials as well as external thermal insulation composite systems.

NAICS: 4233
NAICS Definition: Lumber and Other Construction Materials Merchant Wholesalers
Employees: 11,662
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tcc-group-holdings.jpeg
TCC Group Holdings(台泥企業團)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/knauf.jpeg
Knauf
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
TCC Group Holdings(台泥企業團)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Knauf
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TCC Group Holdings(台泥企業團) in 2025.

Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Knauf in 2025.

Incident History — TCC Group Holdings(台泥企業團) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TCC Group Holdings(台泥企業團) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Knauf (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Knauf cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tcc-group-holdings.jpeg
TCC Group Holdings(台泥企業團)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/knauf.jpeg
Knauf
Incidents

Date Detected: 06/2022
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

TCC Group Holdings(台泥企業團) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Knauf company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Knauf company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas TCC Group Holdings(台泥企業團) company has not reported any.

In the current year, Knauf company and TCC Group Holdings(台泥企業團) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Knauf company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while TCC Group Holdings(台泥企業團) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Knauf company nor TCC Group Holdings(台泥企業團) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Knauf company nor TCC Group Holdings(台泥企業團) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither TCC Group Holdings(台泥企業團) company nor Knauf company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither TCC Group Holdings(台泥企業團) nor Knauf holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Knauf company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to TCC Group Holdings(台泥企業團) company.

Knauf company employs more people globally than TCC Group Holdings(台泥企業團) company, reflecting its scale as a Wholesale Building Materials.

Neither TCC Group Holdings(台泥企業團) nor Knauf holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither TCC Group Holdings(台泥企業團) nor Knauf holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither TCC Group Holdings(台泥企業團) nor Knauf holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither TCC Group Holdings(台泥企業團) nor Knauf holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither TCC Group Holdings(台泥企業團) nor Knauf holds HIPAA certification.

Neither TCC Group Holdings(台泥企業團) nor Knauf holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H