Comparison Overview

Tri-County Behavioral Healthcare

VS

Samaritan Center

Tri-County Behavioral Healthcare

233 Sgt Ed Holcomb Blvd S, Conroe, 77304, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Tri-County Behavioral Healthcare has grown to be a more than $23 million system with 400+ full and part-time staff. The Center’s staff includes board certified psychiatrists, physician’s assistants, advanced practice nurses, licensed professional counselors, licensed social workers, registered and licensed vocational nurses, mental health and intellectual and developmental disabilities professionals and paraprofessionals, and a highly competent administration staff. Tri-County Services offers a comprehensive array of services and supports provided to nearly 7000 individuals with mental illness and 850 persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities on an annual basis; an average of 3000 persons are in service at any one time. Services for individuals with mental illnesses include: Mental Health Screening, Admission and Referral Services, Crisis Hotline Services, Crisis Residential Services, Medication Services, Inpatient Services, Skills Training, Vocational Services, Residential Support Services and Housing, Counseling Services, Criminal Justice Services, and Substance Abuse Prevention. Services for individuals with developmental disabilities include: Mental Retardation Screening, Admission and Referral Services, Home and Community Based Services, Group Homes, Day Habilitation Services, Employment Services, State School Placement and Discharge Services, and Respite Services.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 222
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Samaritan Center

8956 Research Blvd., Bldg 2, Austin, Texas, 78758, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

At Samaritan Center, we heal hearts, provide hope, and enhance lives with a holistic approach to mental health for all ages, whole families and the military community. Samaritan Center was founded on the belief that there is a close relationship between the mind, body, spirit and community. We provide professional counseling, integrative medicine, peer support, wellness education and skills-building workshops that are accessible and affordable in Central Texas. Many clients are uninsured or under-insured low-income families, and veterans and military families struggling with service-related trauma. Our focus on the whole family means we serve all ages - from very young children to older adults - and can truly impact entire family systems. Samaritan Center programs include: • Healthy Community: counseling for children, adults, couples and families • Hope for Heroes: counseling, integrative medicine, and peer support for veterans, military service members and their families • Integrative Medicine: alternative treatments including acupuncture, herbal medicine, body work, nutritional counseling • Military Veteran Peer Network (MVPN): a statewide mental health program that provides peer support for veterans; Samaritan Center facilitates this program in Travis County

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 76
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tcbhc.jpeg
Tri-County Behavioral Healthcare
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/samaritan-center-for-counseling-and-pastoral-care---austin.jpeg
Samaritan Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Tri-County Behavioral Healthcare
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Samaritan Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tri-County Behavioral Healthcare in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Samaritan Center in 2026.

Incident History — Tri-County Behavioral Healthcare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tri-County Behavioral Healthcare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Samaritan Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Samaritan Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tcbhc.jpeg
Tri-County Behavioral Healthcare
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/samaritan-center-for-counseling-and-pastoral-care---austin.jpeg
Samaritan Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Tri-County Behavioral Healthcare company and Samaritan Center company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Samaritan Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Tri-County Behavioral Healthcare company.

In the current year, Samaritan Center company and Tri-County Behavioral Healthcare company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Samaritan Center company nor Tri-County Behavioral Healthcare company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Samaritan Center company nor Tri-County Behavioral Healthcare company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Samaritan Center company nor Tri-County Behavioral Healthcare company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Tri-County Behavioral Healthcare company nor Samaritan Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Tri-County Behavioral Healthcare nor Samaritan Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Tri-County Behavioral Healthcare company nor Samaritan Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Tri-County Behavioral Healthcare company employs more people globally than Samaritan Center company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Tri-County Behavioral Healthcare nor Samaritan Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Tri-County Behavioral Healthcare nor Samaritan Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Tri-County Behavioral Healthcare nor Samaritan Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Tri-County Behavioral Healthcare nor Samaritan Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Tri-County Behavioral Healthcare nor Samaritan Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Tri-County Behavioral Healthcare nor Samaritan Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N